FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122858798> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3122858798 abstract "For decades, courts have struggled with how to treat claims of third party – situations where one employee engages in some protected activity for purposes of Title VII but where the employer retaliates not against that employee, but rather against one of his or her coworkers – his or her spouse, or sibling, or mere workplace acquaintance. While some courts have permitted these third-party retaliation claims in order to ensure robust safeguards against workplace discrimination, other courts have deemed this type of employer conduct to be outside the scope of Title VII’s retaliation provision. With its January 2011 decision in Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP., the United States Supreme Court finally has weighed in on this issue, deeming employees protected against third-party retaliation under Title VII. This Article stands as one of the first in-depth examinations of Thompson and its potential impact on both employers and employees. While this Article approves of the Supreme Court’s decision to deem third-party retaliation claims viable under Title VII, this Article proposes a different framework for analyzing these claims than that applied by the Supreme Court in this case. Specifically, this Article argues that courts should apply jurisprudence from negligent infliction of emotional distress cases to conduct a more structured analysis of third-party retaliation claims. In addition, this Article argues that courts should define the class of plaintiffs who can assert third-party retaliation claims by requiring that only individuals who have engaged in some protected activity can sue. Other employees affected by employer retaliation – those who receive adverse treatment from their employer, but who did not themselves engage in any protected activity – should not be permitted to bring third-party retaliation claims. In articulating this framework, this Article seeks to strike a balance between deterring employers from engaging in retaliatory behavior while avoiding the negative consequences that could result from failing to place reasonable limits on the third-party retaliation doctrine." @default.
• W3122858798 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3122858798 creator A5041931330 @default.
• W3122858798 date "2011-03-04" @default.
• W3122858798 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W3122858798 title "Protected by Association? The Supreme Court’s Incomplete Approach to Defining the Scope of the Third-Party Retaliation Doctrine" @default.
• W3122858798 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W3122858798 type Work @default.
• W3122858798 sameAs 3122858798 @default.
• W3122858798 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3122858798 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3122858798 hasAuthorship W3122858798A5041931330 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C2777495918 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C2983583741 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C10138342 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C108827166 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C144133560 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C17744445 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C182306322 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C199539241 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C2776211767 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C2777495918 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C2778272461 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C2983583741 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C41008148 @default.
• W3122858798 hasConceptScore W3122858798C97460637 @default.
• W3122858798 hasLocation W31228587981 @default.
• W3122858798 hasOpenAccess W3122858798 @default.
• W3122858798 hasPrimaryLocation W31228587981 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1487291053 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1487972423 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1521465084 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1539737866 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1815227031 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1884133431 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W2256465663 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W2260865285 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W2272076625 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W243195079 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W244856353 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W2511473855 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W2702257524 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W296892136 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W3154239482 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W3158890635 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W363143070 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W1842155275 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W3091430955 @default.
• W3122858798 hasRelatedWork W3127441715 @default.
• W3122858798 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3122858798 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3122858798 magId "3122858798" @default.
• W3122858798 workType "article" @default.