FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123048175> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123048175 endingPage "200" @default.
• W3123048175 startingPage "197" @default.
• W3123048175 abstract "The four articles in this Special Issue on Practical Implications of Basic Research on Uncertainty and Utility were solicited in an attempt to meet two goals. The first goal was to get active researches in this field to think about the lessons that recent theoretical and empirical advances in basic research on utility theory might hold for practitioners, i.e., for those who use utility theory to facilitate better decision making in a broad range of applications. Many recent results in behavioral decision theory are not widely known to potential users of such information, because they are reported in a language and manner not readily accessible to practitioners and published in journals that are neither directed and nor read by them. A recent article (Cohen, 1996) on the normative status of expected utility (EU) theory in Medical Decision Making, for example, discussed the defensibility of violations of EU's independence axiom without any reference to the crucial distinction between violations of independence (or monotonicity) per se and violations of common probability accounting equivalences (see Luce, 1990). Some results may seem unimportant from a theoretical perspective to basic researchers, but may have important methodological implications and may raise the level of applications of utility theory significantly, if they were more widely known. The hope was that basic researchers would discuss their work from a fruitfully different perspective if challenged to consider its implications for decision making under uncertainty in areas such as risk analysis, strategic planning, and policy making, or its contributions to address problems in fields such as medicine or finance. They were asked to consider how recent research could improve or change the tools currently used to aid judgments or decisions in applied settings. The second goals was to make decision researchers more aware of unsolved problems that are important to practitioners. Practitioners researchers with content-specific interests were asked to describe pressing assessment or implementation problems in their field and to suggest basic research questions to which they would most like to see answers. In short, the Special Issue was conceived as a step toward narrowing the gap between the producers and potential users of new insights about decision making under risk and uncertainty. Article ID jmps.1999.1255, available online at http: www.idealibrary.com on" @default.
• W3123048175 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123048175 creator A5015882940 @default.
• W3123048175 date "1999-06-01" @default.
• W3123048175 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3123048175 title "GUEST EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION" @default.
• W3123048175 cites W1548224680 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W1674810554 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W1978844375 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2041946752 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2042223112 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2080724357 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2093514456 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2148339260 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2148574912 @default.
• W3123048175 cites W2160978253 @default.
• W3123048175 doi "https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1255" @default.
• W3123048175 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10366515" @default.
• W3123048175 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W3123048175 type Work @default.
• W3123048175 sameAs 3123048175 @default.
• W3123048175 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3123048175 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3123048175 hasAuthorship W3123048175A5015882940 @default.
• W3123048175 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3123048175 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W3123048175 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3123048175 hasConceptScore W3123048175C15744967 @default.
• W3123048175 hasConceptScore W3123048175C188147891 @default.
• W3123048175 hasConceptScore W3123048175C41008148 @default.
• W3123048175 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3123048175 hasLocation W31230481751 @default.
• W3123048175 hasLocation W31230481752 @default.
• W3123048175 hasOpenAccess W3123048175 @default.
• W3123048175 hasPrimaryLocation W31230481751 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2096946506 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2130043461 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3123048175 hasRelatedWork W3004735627 @default.
• W3123048175 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W3123048175 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123048175 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123048175 magId "3123048175" @default.
• W3123048175 workType "article" @default.