Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123068744> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W3123068744 startingPage "489" @default.
- W3123068744 abstract "Abstract The term has been used as shorthand to characterize a variety of diverse agreements between patent owners and alleged infringers that involve a transfer of consideration from the patent owner to the alleged infringer. Reverse payment settlements are particularly associated with drug patent challenges mounted by generic drug companies under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Many, including the Federal Trade Commission, would characterize these agreements as antitrust violations. However, courts have generally declined to find these agreements in violation of the antitrust laws based solely on the presence of a reverse payment. This article begins in Section II with an overview of the diverse array of patent settlement agreements that have been classified within the general taxonomy of payment settlements. Section III discusses a variety of specific factors that have led to a natural proliferation of reverse payments patent settlements between branded and generic drug companies. Section IV traces the development of the FTC's position, which would find most reverse payment settlements presumptively illegal, focusing in particular on its recent ill-fated enforcement action against Schering-Plough. Section V reviews the courts' response to antitrust challenges against reverse payment settlements, and identifies an emerging consensus position that will find a violation of the antitrust laws only in cases where the challenged agreement contains restrictions on competition that exceed the exclusionary potential of the patent. The article concludes in Sections VI and VII with a discussion of the future prospects for the antitrust treatment of reverse payments settlements, including a suggestion that in evaluating the anticompetitive implications of these agreements more explicit consideration be paid to barriers to market entry facing potential third party generic competitors. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. REVERSE PAYMENT SETTLEMENT DEFINED III. SPECIFIC FACTORS PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR REVERSE PAYMENT SETTLEMENTS IN THE DRUG INDUSTRY A. Innovative Drugs Have Intrinsically High Social Utility B. Barriers to Generic Market Entry IV. THE FTC AND REVERSE PAYMENT SETTLEMENTS A. The FTC Originally Focused on Settlement Agreements That Parked Generic Exclusivity or Covered Noninfringing Products B. The FTC's Attention Has Shifted to Reverse Payments C. Schering-Plough Exemplifies This Shift in FTC Focus V. REVERSE PAYMENT SETTLEMENTS IN THE COURTS A. The Consensus Test of the Eleventh and Second Circuits B. Courts Generally Favor Settlement C. Reallocation of Litigation Risk and Upside Potential D. Courts Find Little Meaningful Distinction Between Reverse Payment Settlements and Other Patent Settlements E. Courts Will Not Infer a Weak Patent Case from Reverse Payments F. Courts Have Rejected the FTC's Theories of Antitrust Liability G. The FTC and Courts Agree That the Antitrust Analysis Should Generally Not Involve an Assessment of the Merits of the Underlying Patent Case H. Barriers to Third Party Generic Entry Are Relevant in Assessing Potential Anticompetitive Effect VI. THE FUTURE OF REVERSE PAYMENT SETTLEMENTS A. Supreme Court Intervention Is Unlikely to Occur Soon B. Congress May Act to Ban Reverse Payment Settlements VII. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION On June 26, 2006, U.S. consumers suffered a severe setback when the Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari in the case of FTC v. Schering-Plough Corp. (1) At least that is the position taken by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which asserts that the Eleventh Circuit's holding in Schering-Plough opens the door to collusive and anticompetitive agreements between branded drug companies and their potential generic competitors that keep generic drugs off the market. …" @default.
- W3123068744 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3123068744 creator A5004919850 @default.
- W3123068744 date "2007-03-01" @default.
- W3123068744 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3123068744 title "Do Reverse Payment Settlements Violate the Antitrust Laws" @default.
- W3123068744 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W3123068744 type Work @default.
- W3123068744 sameAs 3123068744 @default.
- W3123068744 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3123068744 countsByYear W31230687442012 @default.
- W3123068744 countsByYear W31230687442018 @default.
- W3123068744 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3123068744 hasAuthorship W3123068744A5004919850 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C16678853 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C198082294 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2776805699 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2777029862 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C2780938662 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C10138342 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C127413603 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C144133560 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C145097563 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C162324750 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C16678853 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C175444787 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C17744445 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C190253527 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C198082294 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C199539241 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2776034101 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2776805699 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2777029862 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2777063073 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2778272461 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2779777834 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C2780938662 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C34974158 @default.
- W3123068744 hasConceptScore W3123068744C548081761 @default.
- W3123068744 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W3123068744 hasLocation W31230687441 @default.
- W3123068744 hasOpenAccess W3123068744 @default.
- W3123068744 hasPrimaryLocation W31230687441 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W115695565 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W1499573088 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W1553390938 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W1893419148 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2031541907 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2038376914 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2138611815 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2169452906 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2270681547 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2750894349 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2788325686 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2791253593 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W2792649980 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W3034783673 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W3121812602 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W3124286995 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W3125492965 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W3158317628 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W1905276932 @default.
- W3123068744 hasRelatedWork W3159529952 @default.
- W3123068744 hasVolume "23" @default.
- W3123068744 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3123068744 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3123068744 magId "3123068744" @default.
- W3123068744 workType "article" @default.