FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123150290> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123150290 startingPage "1495" @default.
• W3123150290 abstract "INTRODUCTION I. THE MODERN POSITION EXPLICATION AND PRELIMINARY DEFENSE A. The Basic Case for the Modern Position 1. Constitutional Structure and Original Intent 2. Pre-Erie Doctrine a. State Authority to Depart from Customary International Law b. Supreme Court Review of Customary International Law c. The General Law as an Intermediate Status 3. Post-Erie Doctrine B. The Limits of the Modern Position 1. Sabbatino and the Inapplicability of Some Customary International Law Norms to Some Acts of Foreign States 2. The Paquete Habana and the Applicability of Customary International Law to Federal Officials C. Sosa and the Modern Position II. THE INTERMEDIATE THEORIES A. Ramsey's Position 1. Nonpreemptive Federal Law as State Law 2. Ramsey's Textual and Historical Support B. Young's Position 1. Young's Criticisms of the Modern Position 2. Young's Intermediate Status for Customary International Law a. State Choice-of-Law Rules i. The Diversity and Indeterminacy of Existing Choice-of-Law Approaches ii. The Inappositeness of Choice-of-Law Rules iii. The Likelihood of Special Choice-of-Law Rules iv. The Role of the Federal Courts v. Summary b. Federal Choice-of-Law Rules C. Aleinikoff's Position D. The Bellia-Clark Position E. The Bradley-Goldsmith-Moore Position III. THE MODERN POSITION, REDUX A. The New Ways of Making Customary International Law B. The New Topics Addressed by Customary International Law IV. STATE INCORPORATION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION In a recent referendum, the citizens of Oklahoma overwhelmingly approved a State constitutional amendment providing that the courts of the State shall not consider international or Sharia law in rendering their decisions. (1) The amendment's exclusion of Sharia has garnered most of the media attention, (2) but more consequential by far is the measure's directive to the State courts to disregard international law. Similar measures have been proposed in other States, some of them merely barring consideration of Sharia or foreign law, (3) but others barring consideration of international as well. (4) These measures are clearly unconstitutional insofar as they would prohibit the State courts from enforcing one of the two main forms of international law--treaties--as the U.S. Constitution by its terms requires State courts to give effect to the nation's treaties, Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. (5) But the federal Constitution does not expressly address the status of the other principal form of international law--customary international law, or the unwritten that governs the relations among states and results from a general and consistent practice of states followed by them from a sense of legal obligation. (6) These proposed State laws thus starkly raise the question whether the States may prohibit their courts from giving effect to the United States' obligations under customary international law. (7) The answer provided by the Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law is a clear no. Reflecting the settled view regarding the status of customary international in the U.S. legal system at the time that it was approved in 1987, the Restatement asserts that such has the status of federal law. (8) As such, it preempts inconsistent State law; State courts must follow federal court interpretations of it; and State court interpretations of it are reviewable in the federal courts. …" @default.
• W3123150290 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123150290 creator A5049455071 @default.
• W3123150290 date "2011-08-01" @default.
• W3123150290 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3123150290 title "Customary International Law as U.S. Law: A Critique of the Revisionist and Intermediate Positions and a Defense of the Modern Position" @default.
• W3123150290 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W3123150290 type Work @default.
• W3123150290 sameAs 3123150290 @default.
• W3123150290 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3123150290 countsByYear W31231502902013 @default.
• W3123150290 countsByYear W31231502902015 @default.
• W3123150290 countsByYear W31231502902018 @default.
• W3123150290 countsByYear W31231502902019 @default.
• W3123150290 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3123150290 hasAuthorship W3123150290A5049455071 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C198082294 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2777006572 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2779921323 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2779967654 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2780598601 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C2780677400 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConcept C8705443 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C10138342 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C149209484 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C162324750 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C170706310 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C17744445 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C177986884 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C185436325 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C198082294 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C199539241 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2776211767 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2776949292 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2777006572 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2777351106 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2778272461 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2779921323 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2779967654 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2780598601 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C2780677400 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C55447825 @default.
• W3123150290 hasConceptScore W3123150290C8705443 @default.
• W3123150290 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3123150290 hasLocation W31231502901 @default.
• W3123150290 hasOpenAccess W3123150290 @default.
• W3123150290 hasPrimaryLocation W31231502901 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1520032223 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1524626114 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1532067112 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1557784316 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1576071992 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1583536883 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W218022634 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W2259629122 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W2261853950 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W234924935 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W2773129620 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W297977456 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W2993592712 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W3121860245 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W3122375146 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W3122437355 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W3123429440 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W54330860 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W1793024257 @default.
• W3123150290 hasRelatedWork W3124307785 @default.
• W3123150290 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W3123150290 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123150290 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123150290 magId "3123150290" @default.
• W3123150290 workType "article" @default.