FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123222760> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123222760 startingPage "523" @default.
• W3123222760 abstract "In this Article, I consider the lessons that the Tea Party offers for scholars of popular constitutionalism. Specifically, I argue that the experience of the Tea Party should spark a reconsideration of some assumptions that tend to drive much of the interest in popular constitutionalism. Some who have embraced popular constitutionalism seem to assume that popular constitutional mobilization is a vehicle particularly well suited for advancing progressive constitutional claims. Alternately, some have assumed that popular constitutionalism has no particular ideological or partisan valence - that it is basically a neutral vehicle for advancing constitution claims of all kinds. But the lessons of the Tea Party might re-quire a rethinking of these assumptions. The Tea Party has shown that, at least on the modern American scene, popular constitutional mobilization is particularly effective at advancing causes much closer to the heart of the conservative or libertarian agenda. Part of the explanation for this has to do with the nature of constitutionalism as well as cultural assumptions prevalent in recent American history. But, more importantly, it has to do with the mechanism available for popular constitutional mobilization. These mechanisms serve certain causes better than others, and they serve demands for less government regulation particularly well. This, I suggest, has been the central lesson of the Tea Party for popular constitutionalism. In Part I of this Article, I examine the basic project of popular constitutionalism, including its normative implications. I explore the challenges popular constitutionalists have had in defining their central concept, and I offer a working definition of popular constitutionalism that identifies what is unique about efforts of constitutional mobilization (as differentiated from social movements that lead to constitutional change). Part II describes the basic tenets of Tea Party constitutionalism. Here I explore the substance of the Tea Party’s constitutional vision, the strategies of constitutional interpretation the Tea Party has embraced, and the predominantly extrajudicial processes by which the Tea Party has sought to advance its reading of the Constitution. Part III then considers whether popular constitutionalism advances certain claims on the Constitution better than others. Drawing on the lessons of the Tea Party, I look at those mechanisms that have proven particularly effective at mobilizing and advancing popular constitutional claims, and I question how different kinds of claims might be advanced through these mechanisms. I suggest that there is some evidence to support the hypothesis that popular constitutionalism may be most effective when it is used to advance a conservative-libertarian agenda, such as that of the Tea Party." @default.
• W3123222760 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123222760 creator A5020389209 @default.
• W3123222760 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W3123222760 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3123222760 title "Popular Constitutionalism on the Right: Lessons from the Tea Party" @default.
• W3123222760 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W3123222760 type Work @default.
• W3123222760 sameAs 3123222760 @default.
• W3123222760 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3123222760 countsByYear W31232227602012 @default.
• W3123222760 countsByYear W31232227602015 @default.
• W3123222760 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3123222760 hasAuthorship W3123222760A5020389209 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C70999106 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C144024400 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C17744445 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C190253527 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C199539241 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C2776154427 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C44725695 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C555826173 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C70999106 @default.
• W3123222760 hasConceptScore W3123222760C94625758 @default.
• W3123222760 hasLocation W31232227601 @default.
• W3123222760 hasOpenAccess W3123222760 @default.
• W3123222760 hasPrimaryLocation W31232227601 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W136125276 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W1514016340 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W1535942885 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W1570626846 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W1604927578 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W1898252573 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W1931735142 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W2144876222 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W2200183751 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W2258046015 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W2286026450 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W2344352922 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W2709113901 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W3020655275 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W3121342922 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W3121778346 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W3125672029 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W3154229072 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W328016875 @default.
• W3123222760 hasRelatedWork W92701236 @default.
• W3123222760 hasVolume "88" @default.
• W3123222760 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123222760 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123222760 magId "3123222760" @default.
• W3123222760 workType "article" @default.