FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123313501> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123313501 endingPage "145" @default.
• W3123313501 startingPage "117" @default.
• W3123313501 abstract "Lawyers should care about their reputations. But exactly what sort of reputation should lawyers seek to establish and maintain in the largely nontransparent context of legal negotiation? And even if a lawyer has developed a reputation as a negotiator, how will he/she know what it is and how it came to be? I force my students to grapple with these questions by incorporating the issues of reputation and reputation development into my negotiation/mediation course. I introduced this innovation at the same time that I decided to increase my focus on developing students' skills in distributive (or value-claiming) negotiation. Although legal negotiation certainly offers frequent opportunities for the creation of integrative joint and individual gains, the process will almost inevitably involve distribution. The pie, once baked, must be cut. As a result, I now base a portion of my students' final grade on the objective results they achieve in two negotiation simulations. Two dangers of this assessment choice are that it can encourage students to focus only on the numbers and, even worse, engage in “sharp practice”— an extreme form of hard bargaining that tests ethical boundaries — in order to achieve the best short-term distributive outcomes. Of course, neither a quantitative focus nor sharp practice is synonymous with a distributive approach to negotiation. Nonetheless, to counterbalance the temptations posed by the focus on, and ranking of, objective results, I also base part of students' final grades on their scores on a “Reputation Index.” These scores are based on students' nominations of their peers, accompanied by explanatory comments. This article describes the Reputation Index and how I use it. It also explores the empirical support for the validity of the Reputation Index as a tool for simulating the development and assessment of lawyers' reputations in the “real world.” To that end, the article considers research regarding the bases for lawyers' perceptions of effectiveness in legal negotiation, the sometimes counterintuitive distinction between negotiation “approach” and negotiation “style,” and the relationships among perceptions of negotiation style, procedural justice, trustworthiness, and reputation." @default.
• W3123313501 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123313501 creator A5080347462 @default.
• W3123313501 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W3123313501 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W3123313501 title "The Reputational Advantages of Demonstrating Trustworthiness: Using the Reputation Index with Law Students" @default.
• W3123313501 cites W1976972579 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W1983424978 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2006167134 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2006379789 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2008168954 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2018351255 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2030957331 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2049858219 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2123850572 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2128168853 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2142175015 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2158423882 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2166206913 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W2334838163 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W4205724940 @default.
• W3123313501 cites W69374625 @default.
• W3123313501 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00329.x" @default.
• W3123313501 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W3123313501 type Work @default.
• W3123313501 sameAs 3123313501 @default.
• W3123313501 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3123313501 countsByYear W31233135012012 @default.
• W3123313501 countsByYear W31233135012013 @default.
• W3123313501 countsByYear W31233135012017 @default.
• W3123313501 countsByYear W31233135012021 @default.
• W3123313501 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3123313501 hasAuthorship W3123313501A5080347462 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C11821877 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C11821877 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C144024400 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C151730666 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C15744967 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C17744445 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C190253527 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C199539241 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C199776023 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C202444582 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C2779343474 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C33923547 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C39549134 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C48798503 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C77805123 @default.
• W3123313501 hasConceptScore W3123313501C86803240 @default.
• W3123313501 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3123313501 hasLocation W31233135011 @default.
• W3123313501 hasOpenAccess W3123313501 @default.
• W3123313501 hasPrimaryLocation W31233135011 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W1538108203 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2002919081 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2008168954 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2039392144 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2083169762 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2100551970 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2142078291 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2566355366 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3123313501 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3123313501 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W3123313501 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123313501 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123313501 magId "3123313501" @default.
• W3123313501 workType "article" @default.