FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123387877> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123387877 abstract "The economic crisis gripping the United States began when large numbers of homeowners defaulted on poorly underwritten subprime mortgage loans. Demand from Wall Street seduced mortgage lenders, brokers, and other players to churn out mortgage loans in extraordinary numbers. Securitization, the process of utilizing mortgage loans to back investment instruments, not only fanned the fire; the parties to these deals often handled and transferred the legally important documents that secure the resulting investments - the loan notes and mortgages - in a careless and sometimes fraudulent manner. The consequences of this behavior are now becoming evident. All over the country, courts are scrutinizing whether the parties initiating foreclosures against homeowners have the right to take this action when authority to enforce the note and mortgage is absent. Without this right, foreclosure sales can be reversed. This concern is most acute in the majority of states where foreclosures occur with little or no judicial oversight before the sale, such as Massachusetts. Due to the recent decision in U.S. Bank N.A. v. Ibanez, in which the Supreme Judicial Court voided two foreclosure sales where the foreclosing parties did not hold the mortgage, Massachusetts is the focal jurisdiction where an important conflict is unfolding. This article explores the extent to which the Ibanez ruling may influence the jurisprudence in other non-judicial foreclosure states and the likelihood that clear title to foreclosed properties is jeopardized by the shoddy handling of notes and mortgages. I focus on Arizona, California, Georgia, and Nevada because they permit non-judicial foreclosures and they are experiencing high seriously delinquent and foreclosure rates. After comparing the law in these states to that of Massachusetts, I conclude that Ibanez will have little effect in Arizona but should be influential in the other states, to varying degrees. As a result, property title trouble is likely in Georgia and Nevada, and to a lesser extent in California. The article also provides a roadmap for others to assess the extent to which title to properties purchased at foreclosure sales or from lenders’ REO inventories might be defective in other states. Finally, I address the potential consequences of reversing foreclosure sales and responds to the securitization industry’s worry about homeowners getting free houses." @default.
• W3123387877 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123387877 creator A5088508777 @default.
• W3123387877 date "2012-02-21" @default.
• W3123387877 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3123387877 title "Property Title Trouble in Non-Judicial Foreclosure States: The Ibanez Time Bomb?" @default.
• W3123387877 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W3123387877 type Work @default.
• W3123387877 sameAs 3123387877 @default.
• W3123387877 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3123387877 countsByYear W31233878772019 @default.
• W3123387877 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3123387877 hasAuthorship W3123387877A5088508777 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C120397944 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C2776830614 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C2777764128 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C2780619108 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConcept C73283319 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C10138342 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C120397944 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C144133560 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C162324750 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C17744445 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C190253527 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C199539241 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C2776830614 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C2776949292 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C2777764128 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C2778272461 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C2780619108 @default.
• W3123387877 hasConceptScore W3123387877C73283319 @default.
• W3123387877 hasLocation W31233878771 @default.
• W3123387877 hasOpenAccess W3123387877 @default.
• W3123387877 hasPrimaryLocation W31233878771 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W1529389944 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W1593505792 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W1751420225 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W1779923411 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W1927209912 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W1946927505 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W2229532653 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W233899861 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W2343495395 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W2471868969 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3121748862 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3122438334 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3122885830 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3123079658 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3123771747 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3124118302 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W3125285701 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W326846076 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W796932421 @default.
• W3123387877 hasRelatedWork W2908991308 @default.
• W3123387877 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123387877 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123387877 magId "3123387877" @default.
• W3123387877 workType "article" @default.