FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123578737> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123578737 endingPage "1453" @default.
• W3123578737 startingPage "1397" @default.
• W3123578737 abstract "Although most sex offenses are committed by relatives or acquaintances of the victims, our public policy approach has been to focus on the stranger sex offender and punish sex offenders through residency restrictions. These residency restrictions effectively banish these locally undesirable and dangerous individuals from our communities in fear that they may reoffend in our neighborhoods. Rather than being thrust into some wilderness, sex offenders are “banished” to neighboring counties or states and into poor, minority neighborhoods where they often live in boarding houses with other sex offenders. Banishing sex offenders through these residential restrictions impacts individual liberty, our national structure, and social policy considerations. This Article offers a legal analysis of the adverse impacts these restrictions impose on the constitutional rights of both sex offenders and our communities, which for economic or political limitations do not have the appropriate representation to mitigate these consequences. This Article also examines what methods from the environmental justice movement might be available to deal with the “social justice” issue of sex offenders disproportionately burdening poor, minority communities. Finally, because there is not yet evidence to support the efficacy of residency restrictions on sex offender recidivism, this Article concludes that legislators should reexamine the current trend of using residency restrictions to address concerns about sex offender recidivism. Instead, public policy decision makers should look toward alternatives, such as individualized risk assessment and management of these individuals, so  Associate Dean of Academics and Professor of Law, Pepperdine University School of Law. I am grateful to Dean Ken Starr and Pepperdine for research grant support for this project. I would also like to thank and acknowledge Dean Wayne A. Logan of the Florida State University College of Law for his much appreciated guidance and insight for this piece, as well as Professor Brannon P. Denning of the Samford University Cumberland School of Law. Recognition is also in order for student research assistants Lynsey Blackmon Eaton, Aaron Summer, Kasey Curtis, and Seth Eaton, who assisted with the research and editing process, and for Randi Saxer, who reviewed the sociological aspects of the text. Washington University Open Scholarship 1398 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [VOL. 86:1397 that public resources can be properly directed to confine, monitor, and treat those sex offenders most likely to commit serious reoffenses." @default.
• W3123578737 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123578737 creator A5059796766 @default.
• W3123578737 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W3123578737 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3123578737 title "Banishment of Sex Offenders: Liberty, Protectionism, Justice, and Alternatives" @default.
• W3123578737 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W3123578737 type Work @default.
• W3123578737 sameAs 3123578737 @default.
• W3123578737 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3123578737 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3123578737 hasAuthorship W3123578737A5059796766 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C2776090404 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C2777978526 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C2780378152 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C102587632 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C139621336 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C144024400 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C17744445 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C199539241 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C2776090404 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C2777978526 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C2780378152 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C73484699 @default.
• W3123578737 hasConceptScore W3123578737C94625758 @default.
• W3123578737 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3123578737 hasLocation W31235787371 @default.
• W3123578737 hasOpenAccess W3123578737 @default.
• W3123578737 hasPrimaryLocation W31235787371 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1435872278 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1494445135 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1499236185 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1515202066 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1525628136 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1772017157 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2100040061 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2115304254 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2270968631 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W228323397 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2344522927 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2598198037 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2904445445 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W3068183106 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W3104962082 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W3123152560 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W3198827616 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W1434934549 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2741546195 @default.
• W3123578737 hasRelatedWork W2888455649 @default.
• W3123578737 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W3123578737 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123578737 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123578737 magId "3123578737" @default.
• W3123578737 workType "article" @default.