FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3123642417> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3123642417 startingPage "173" @default.
• W3123642417 abstract "As in many other industries, artificial intelligence (“AI”) is poised to drastically transform the legal services landscape. “Bots,” automated expert systems, and predictive analytics are already changing the way consumers seek, and lawyers provide, legal services. Among other impacts, AI has the potential to increase access to justice in the self-help, individual, and corporate law firm markets by lowering costs and expanding services to untapped markets. A prominent question in early literature on AI in law is whether these services constitute the unauthorized practice of law. Threshold questions of whether and by whom such services should be regulated are important, but will likely not be answered (or even answerable) until AI’s impact on the profession is more cognizable. In the meantime, there is currently no comprehensive guidance for attorneys on how AI should be developed, adopted, and used in ways that conform to a lawyer’s ethical obligations. Without such guidance, law firms and third-party services risk designing and adopting AI-driven tools that fail to provide effective client-centered services, inhibit wide-spread access to justice, and undermine lawyers’ ethical obligations to current and former clients, including the obligations to practice competently, maintain confidentiality, effectively supervise third parties, communicate with clients, and exercise independent judgment and render candid advice. This Article initiates this critical dialogue by exploring the types of AI being implemented in the profession, and identifying characteristics of these emerging services that will present ethical tensions and challenges. It rigorously examines existing guidance from the ABA and state bar authorities concerning new technology in practice, and identifies areas where this guidance is not sufficient to confront the unique ethical issues presented by AI. This article does not attempt to provide detailed or prescriptive guidance on these issues, but rather identifies the imminent challenges not currently being addressed in the literature on AI and legal ethics, or by bar authorities. The concluding recommendations will set the stage for and inform future scholarship and discussions concerning legal ethics, access to justice, and unauthorized practice of law in the age of AI." @default.
• W3123642417 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3123642417 creator A5007443087 @default.
• W3123642417 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W3123642417 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3123642417 title "Ethical Issues in Robo-Lawyering: The Need for Guidance on Developing and Using Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of Law" @default.
• W3123642417 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3123642417 type Work @default.
• W3123642417 sameAs 3123642417 @default.
• W3123642417 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3123642417 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3123642417 hasAuthorship W3123642417A5007443087 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C170692843 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C2777421848 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C2993911517 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C503263630 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConcept C71745522 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C139621336 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C144133560 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C170692843 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C17744445 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C199539241 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C2777421848 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C2993911517 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C39549134 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C503263630 @default.
• W3123642417 hasConceptScore W3123642417C71745522 @default.
• W3123642417 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3123642417 hasLocation W31236424171 @default.
• W3123642417 hasOpenAccess W3123642417 @default.
• W3123642417 hasPrimaryLocation W31236424171 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2068048790 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2197528801 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2507185652 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2516786901 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2557190034 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2761684260 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2815585116 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2911783248 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2930420307 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2950319082 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2991703064 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W2999508092 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3022234649 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3122471480 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3128261461 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3155284701 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3158705972 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3202452139 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3203946181 @default.
• W3123642417 hasRelatedWork W3033676767 @default.
• W3123642417 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W3123642417 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3123642417 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3123642417 magId "3123642417" @default.
• W3123642417 workType "article" @default.