Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124014215> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W3124014215 startingPage "125" @default.
- W3124014215 abstract "The prospect of digital manipulation on major online platforms has reached fever pitch in the last election cycle in the United States. Jonathan Zittrain’s concern about “digital gerrymandering” has found resonance in reports, which were resoundingly denied by Facebook, of the company’s alleged editing content to tone down conservative voices. At the start of the election cycle, critics blasted Facebook for allegedly injecting editorial bias into an apparently neutral content generator, its “Trending Topics” feature. Immediately after the election, when the extent of dissemination of “fake news” through social media became known, commentators chastised Facebook for not proactively policing user generated content to block and remove untrustworthy information. Which one is it then? Should Facebook have deployed policy directed technologies or should its content algorithm have remained policy neutral? This article examines the potential for bias and discrimination in automated algorithmic decision making. As a group of commentators recently asserted, “The accountability mechanisms and legal standards that govern such decision processes have not kept pace with technology.” Yet the article rejects an approach that depicts every algorithmic process as a “black box,” which is inevitably plagued by bias and potential injustice. While recognizing that algorithms are manmade artifacts written and edited by humans in order to code decision making processes, the article argues that a distinction should be drawn between “policy neutral algorithms,” which lack an active editorial hand, and “policy directed algorithms,” which are intentionally framed to pursue a designer’s policy agenda. Policy neutral algorithms could in some cases reflect existing entrenched societal biases and historic inequities. Companies, in turn, can choose to fix their results through active social engineering. For example, after facing controversy in light of an algorithmic determination to not offer same-day delivery in low-income neighborhoods, Amazon has nevertheless recently decided to offer the services in order to pursue an agenda of equal opportunity. Recognizing that its decision making process, which was based on logistical factors and expected demand, had the effect of accentuating prevailing social inequality, Amazon chose to level the playing field. Policy directed algorithms are purposely engineered to correct for apparent bias and discrimination or intentionally designed to advance a predefined policy agenda. In this case, it is essential that companies provide transparency about their active pursuit of editorial policies. For example, if a search engine decides to scrub search results clean of apparent bias and discrimination, it should let users know they are seeing a manicured version of the world. If a service optimizes results for financial motives without alerting users, it risks violating FTC standards for disclosure. So too should service providers consider themselves obligated to prominently disclose important criteria that reflect an unexpected policy agenda. The transparency called for is not one based on revealing source code, but rather public accountability about the editorial nature of the algorithm. The article addresses questions surrounding the boundaries of responsibility for algorithmic fairness, and analyzes a series of case studies under the proposed framework." @default.
- W3124014215 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3124014215 creator A5017349351 @default.
- W3124014215 creator A5025686090 @default.
- W3124014215 date "2018-01-01" @default.
- W3124014215 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3124014215 title "Taming The Golem: Challenges of Ethical Algorithmic Decision-Making" @default.
- W3124014215 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W3124014215 type Work @default.
- W3124014215 sameAs 3124014215 @default.
- W3124014215 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W3124014215 countsByYear W31240142152018 @default.
- W3124014215 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3124014215 hasAuthorship W3124014215A5017349351 @default.
- W3124014215 hasAuthorship W3124014215A5025686090 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C2777266375 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C2777526511 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C108827166 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C13280743 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C144024400 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C17744445 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C190253527 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C199539241 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C205649164 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C2776007630 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C2777266375 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C2777526511 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C39549134 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C41008148 @default.
- W3124014215 hasConceptScore W3124014215C518677369 @default.
- W3124014215 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3124014215 hasLocation W31240142151 @default.
- W3124014215 hasOpenAccess W3124014215 @default.
- W3124014215 hasPrimaryLocation W31240142151 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W1584150804 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W2297895487 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W2338526662 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W242263354 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W2622578339 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W2756120017 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W2980120988 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3005201016 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3016242181 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3043487384 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3118786906 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3122843508 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3123368854 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3123410077 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3123506941 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3123999934 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3130003864 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3135265516 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3201931888 @default.
- W3124014215 hasRelatedWork W3212817753 @default.
- W3124014215 hasVolume "19" @default.
- W3124014215 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3124014215 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3124014215 magId "3124014215" @default.
- W3124014215 workType "article" @default.