Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124137948> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W3124137948 endingPage "556" @default.
- W3124137948 startingPage "481" @default.
- W3124137948 abstract "This Article concerns an aspect of Article III standing that has figured in many of the highest-profile controversies of recent years, including litigation over the Affordable Care Act, immigration policy, and climate change. Although the federal courts constantly emphasize the importance of ensuring that only proper plaintiffs invoke the federal judicial power, the Supreme Court and other federal courts have developed a significant exception to the usual requirement of standing. This exception holds that a court entertaining a multiple-plaintiff case may dispense with inquiring into the standing of each plaintiff as long as the court finds that one plaintiff has standing. This practice of partially bypassing the requirement of standing is not limited to cases in which the plaintiffs are about to lose on other grounds anyway. Put differently, courts are willing to assume that all plaintiffs have standing as long as one plaintiff has it and then decide the merits either for or against all plaintiffs despite doubts as to the standing of some of those plaintiffs. We could call this the “one-plaintiff rule.”This Article examines the one-plaintiff rule from normative and positive perspectives. On the normative side, the goal is to establish that the one-plaintiff rule is erroneous in light of principle, precedent, and policy. All plaintiffs need standing, even if all of them present similar legal claims and regardless of the form of relief they seek. To motivate the normative inquiry, the Article also explains why the one-plaintiff rule is harmful as a practical matter, namely because it assigns concrete benefits and detriments to persons to whom they do not belong. The Article’s other principal goal is to explain the puzzle of how the mistaken one-plaintiff rule could attain such widespread acceptance. The explanatory account assigns the blame for the one-plaintiff rule to the incentives of courts and litigants as well as to the development of certain problematic understandings of the nature of judicial power." @default.
- W3124137948 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3124137948 creator A5060733532 @default.
- W3124137948 date "2017-12-12" @default.
- W3124137948 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3124137948 title "One Good Plaintiff Is Not Enough" @default.
- W3124137948 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W3124137948 type Work @default.
- W3124137948 sameAs 3124137948 @default.
- W3124137948 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3124137948 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3124137948 hasAuthorship W3124137948A5060733532 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C144024400 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C17744445 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C190253527 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C199539241 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C2778272461 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C44725695 @default.
- W3124137948 hasConceptScore W3124137948C97460637 @default.
- W3124137948 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W3124137948 hasLocation W31241379481 @default.
- W3124137948 hasOpenAccess W3124137948 @default.
- W3124137948 hasPrimaryLocation W31241379481 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W102169155 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W1686373121 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2014936995 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2262427620 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2263616336 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2300338788 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W237262462 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2485663520 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2506673701 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2583350979 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W3121272391 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W3121339993 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W3121485028 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W3126124566 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W333430812 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W335237032 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W340296232 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W72731061 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2111549510 @default.
- W3124137948 hasRelatedWork W2189744932 @default.
- W3124137948 hasVolume "67" @default.
- W3124137948 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3124137948 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3124137948 magId "3124137948" @default.
- W3124137948 workType "article" @default.