FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124190911> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124190911 abstract "The federal government implemented a new expenditure management system in 2007. Under the new system, departments are required to review programs on a four-year cycle to determine if they are aligned with federal responsibilities and priorities, if they are efficiently delivered and if they are providing value for money, or effective. Based on the results from these strategic reviews, which are expected to be supported by formal evaluations that provide the evidence base for decisions, departments are expected to identify five per cent of their direct program spending that could be reallocated to other priorities, including deficit reduction. This system has much to recommend it, but to realize the full potential of the new system two fundamental changes should be made. First, spending programs delivered through the tax system should be integrated into the expenditure management system. Integration implies that departments would be given responsibility for both tax and spending initiatives that are relevant to their mandates, and that tax-based expenditures would be subject to the government’s evaluation policy and be included in strategic reviews. Second, while departments should continue to have responsibility for evaluating program efficiency, evaluations of both tax- and spending-program effectiveness should be undertaken by an independent entity such as the Parliamentary Budget Officer. Effectiveness evaluations should be carried out using a variant of the benefit-cost framework that is now applied to government regulatory initiatives. In order for the reformed system to work, more resources will need to be allocated to developing the performance data needed to undertake effectiveness evaluations and to perform the evaluations. These changes go well beyond a recent recommendation by a House of Commons committee to include tax expenditures in departmental reports to Parliament, along with planned program spending. The government rejected the recommendation, arguing that the change would undermine the finance minister’s authority over the tax system. Reform cannot proceed unless the finance minister relinquishes his power, exercised jointly with the prime minister, to introduce, modify, or eliminate tax measures related to the mandate of a program minister without the consent of the minister." @default.
• W3124190911 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124190911 creator A5085127377 @default.
• W3124190911 date "2012-12-01" @default.
• W3124190911 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3124190911 title "Managing Tax Expenditures and Government Program Spending: Proposals for Reform" @default.
• W3124190911 doi "https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v5i0.42406" @default.
• W3124190911 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W3124190911 type Work @default.
• W3124190911 sameAs 3124190911 @default.
• W3124190911 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3124190911 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3124190911 hasAuthorship W3124190911A5085127377 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C100243477 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C162077342 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C2781356325 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConcept C551662922 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C100001284 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C100243477 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C138885662 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C144133560 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C162077342 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C162324750 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C2778137410 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C2781356325 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C34447519 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C41895202 @default.
• W3124190911 hasConceptScore W3124190911C551662922 @default.
• W3124190911 hasLocation W31241909111 @default.
• W3124190911 hasLocation W31241909112 @default.
• W3124190911 hasOpenAccess W3124190911 @default.
• W3124190911 hasPrimaryLocation W31241909111 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W1528555178 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W1536639716 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W2113961328 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W2218310664 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W2245993945 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W2322680204 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W2336698573 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W2342255406 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W3123214246 @default.
• W3124190911 hasRelatedWork W3124190911 @default.
• W3124190911 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124190911 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124190911 magId "3124190911" @default.
• W3124190911 workType "article" @default.