FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124231135> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124231135 startingPage "1345" @default.
• W3124231135 abstract "Table of ContentsI. The Future of the Right to Counsel 1346II. The Need for Excellent Lawyers to Represent the Truly Innocent Armed Only with Reasonable Doubt, Which Is Perceived Objectively as Potential 1350III. Defenders Think They Know Who Is Guilty, and They Do Much of the Time, but Not Necessarily When It Matters Most 1352IV. The Theoretically Easy Answer of Good Lawyers for All 1354V. The Harsh Present Reality Based in Fiscal and Empathy Limitations 1355VI. Those Who Care About Innocence Should Stick Together: The Argument that Public Defenders Protect Some of the Innocent May Be Inadequate, but It Is the Best Argument Available, and It Has the Benefit of Being True 1359A. Help Those Innocent Defendants We Can with Arguments for Innocence 1359?. Assist the Innocent with Organizational and Procedural Mechanisms that Engender Neutrality in Investigation and Charging and Augment Reliability 1360C. Open up the Information: Full Open-File Discovery 1360VII. Support Reforms that Reduce the Impact of Inadequate Counsel but Not Those that Diminish the Command for Excellent Counsel 1361VIII. Conclusion 1362I. The Future of the Right to CounselAn examination of Gideon v. Wainwright1 after fifty years involves both its past failures and accomplishments and its future impact. Gideon's legacy is enormously positive with the expansion of rights to so many indigent defendants in need of representation against criminal charges that could deny them life and liberty, but its inadequacies in fulfilling its full promise are glaring as well. These competing themes are reflected in many articles that are part of this symposium.2 I choose to focus principally on its future, which, of course, will likely be guided by its past.In this period of reflection on Gideon, I have had the opportunity to participate in three conferences examining this landmark decision. The first, which was held early in 2010,3 recognized the difficulties in fulfilling Gideon's promise of effective assistance to all those entitled to an attorney under the Sixth Amendment, but it differed from the latter two occurring in 2012 in its degree of (perhaps unrealistic) optimism. The latter two, including the wonderful symposium at Washington and Lee University School of Law,4 exhibit their share of optimism, but they contain many more voices suggesting reexamination of the dimensions of Gideon and its costs and suggesting alternatives to traditional attorney representation.For me, the obvious and sufficient explanation for the difference in focus is twofold. The first is the recognition of the magnitude of the economic downturn that was not yet fully appreciated in 2009. The second is the intervening mid-term election in 2010, which changed the conversation and the political landscape at the national, state, and local levels with respect to resources available for public purposes. While I wish we could address this new reality with traditional responses, I doubt that is possible and therefore applaud the new voices and proposals. They give us the chance to remake the system of representation of those charged with crime for the better and provide additional tools to meet the challenges of a much more difficult environment.In considering new critiques and proposals, however, I suggest limitations both on the criticism of Gideon and on the types of proposals that should be entertained. Gideon can hardly be criticized because it has led to excessive spending on unneeded services. I have not seen the evidence that either excessive spending has occurred or that defense services are unneeded, particularly in the modern world of growing complexity in criminal litigation. …" @default.
• W3124231135 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124231135 creator A5052696392 @default.
• W3124231135 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W3124231135 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W3124231135 title "Potential Innocence: Making the Most of a Bleak Environment for Public Support of Indigent Defense" @default.
• W3124231135 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W3124231135 type Work @default.
• W3124231135 sameAs 3124231135 @default.
• W3124231135 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3124231135 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3124231135 hasAuthorship W3124231135A5052696392 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C2777359062 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C2779137516 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C2779581858 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C2910235986 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C102587632 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C144024400 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C17744445 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C185592680 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C190253527 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C199539241 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C2777359062 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C2778272461 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C2779137516 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C2779581858 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C2910235986 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C55493867 @default.
• W3124231135 hasConceptScore W3124231135C98184364 @default.
• W3124231135 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3124231135 hasLocation W31242311351 @default.
• W3124231135 hasOpenAccess W3124231135 @default.
• W3124231135 hasPrimaryLocation W31242311351 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W1486665681 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W1567104279 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W1757466353 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W1874991799 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2018045817 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2273559135 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2586965010 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2756300460 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2797625518 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W280555598 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W284161870 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W288585395 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W3122472578 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W3125688686 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W348677536 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W1879238554 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W1961352467 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2156963963 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W2765676648 @default.
• W3124231135 hasRelatedWork W3124086914 @default.
• W3124231135 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W3124231135 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124231135 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124231135 magId "3124231135" @default.
• W3124231135 workType "article" @default.