FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124518874> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124518874 endingPage "37" @default.
• W3124518874 startingPage "21" @default.
• W3124518874 abstract "ABSTRACTThis paper studies the relationship between structural equation modeling and Balanced Scorecard in a Swiss non-profit establishment. Using financial and non-financial indicators collected directly from the organization, the paper proposes a rational construction and analysis of Balanced Scorecard by selecting the factual metrics for the right strategic areas. This choice is made by applying a sequence of Partial Least Squares in the proposed model. Furthermore, the approach establishes the cause-and-effect sequence originally defined by Kaplan and Norton as: the measures of organizational learning and growth will influence the measures of internal business processes, which, sequentially, will impact the measures of the customer perspective that, lastly, will affect the financial indicators. It will be noted that the Kaplan and Norton model of Balanced Scorecard is different from the findings in this study, a case somehow too general to handle today 's complex market environment. Following this, the paper puts forward a time-managed approach to identify the evolution of the main contributors to the current company's strategy as well as their behavior in the future organizational performance. This approach will be applied and demonstrated in a detailed real case of a Swiss non-profit organization.JEL: G39, M19, M40, L31KEYWORDS: Balanced Scorecard, Key Performance Indicators, Performance Measurement, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Partial Least Squares (PLS), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Non-profit Organization(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)INTRODUCTIONAn innovative approach of strategic management was introduced in the early 1990s by Robert Kaplan from Harvard Business School and David Norton, co-founder and president of Balanced Scorecard Collaborative Inc., based in Boston, USA. They named this approach the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). Pinpointing some of the drawbacks and ambiguity of previous management systems, the BSC method proposes a coherent guidance as to what companies should measure in order to balance the financial perspective.The BSC summarizes a series of indicators that offers executives a quick but comprehensive representation of their business. The BSC includes financial indicators that illustrate the outcomes of actions already taken and it complements the financial measures with indicators on customer satisfaction, internal processes, and the company's innovation and development activities - operational measures that are the drivers of future financial performance (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).However, one of the limitations of the BSC lies in its structure. Despite the fact that the authors provide us with some key points and describe the steps for building the BSC, the concepts are rather ambiguous and can be difficult to apply in an organizational environment. There are three main goals in this study. The first goal is to merge the above concepts and try to advance several statements for a representative construction of a BSC using the Partial Least Square (PLS) technique. The objective is to generate a realistic model that can be applied in any organization environment, thus modeling the concept of BSC. The second goal is to validate the assumptions with a nonprofit organization case where indicators selected will outline the different strategic perspectives, and a rational explanation for this selection is established. A cause-and-effect structure will be generated and clarifications made as to which strategic perspectives (latent variables) are influencing and which are to be influenced. One of the main conclusions of this example is that the Kaplan and Norton's model of BSC is nothing more but a particular case of our conclusions. The final aim is to closely monitor on a timely basis the upmost indicators that affected the organizational performance, indicators that will shape the future company's strategy. …" @default.
• W3124518874 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124518874 creator A5013721697 @default.
• W3124518874 creator A5038941885 @default.
• W3124518874 creator A5044022175 @default.
• W3124518874 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W3124518874 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3124518874 title "The Relationship between Structural Equation Modeling and Balanced Scorecard: Evidence from a Swiss Non Profit Organization" @default.
• W3124518874 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W3124518874 type Work @default.
• W3124518874 sameAs 3124518874 @default.
• W3124518874 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3124518874 countsByYear W31245188742017 @default.
• W3124518874 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3124518874 hasAuthorship W3124518874A5013721697 @default.
• W3124518874 hasAuthorship W3124518874A5038941885 @default.
• W3124518874 hasAuthorship W3124518874A5044022175 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C135510737 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C136708423 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C141571065 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C165672731 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C181622380 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C199004533 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C22354355 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConcept C86275758 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C119857082 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C135510737 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C136708423 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C141571065 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C144133560 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C162324750 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C165672731 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C175444787 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C181622380 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C187736073 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C195094911 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C199004533 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C22354355 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C41008148 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C71104824 @default.
• W3124518874 hasConceptScore W3124518874C86275758 @default.
• W3124518874 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3124518874 hasLocation W31245188741 @default.
• W3124518874 hasOpenAccess W3124518874 @default.
• W3124518874 hasPrimaryLocation W31245188741 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W1534121212 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W1918445427 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W1973239977 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2077938216 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2124673925 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2183891157 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2211630663 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2242900485 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W261487352 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2949929771 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W3004810601 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W3123122440 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W3125610322 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W55147581 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W62772167 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W69593554 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W864974744 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2184678484 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2186016665 @default.
• W3124518874 hasRelatedWork W2754915527 @default.
• W3124518874 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W3124518874 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124518874 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124518874 magId "3124518874" @default.
• W3124518874 workType "article" @default.