Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124552275> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W3124552275 startingPage "217" @default.
- W3124552275 abstract "Erie killed general law. Due to statutory, constitutional, and fairness constraints, a federal court generally must apply state substantive law in diversity and supplemental jurisdiction cases.Since our nation’s founding, however, federal courts have treated equity as an independent branch of general law, binding of its own force in all cases that come before them. In Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, the Supreme Court held that, notwithstanding Erie, federal courts may continue to rely on traditional principles of equity derived from the English Court of Chancery to determine the availability of equitable relief, such as injunctions, receiverships, and equitable liens, in cases arising under state law. This so-called “equitable remedial rights doctrine” is based on an anachronistic misunderstanding of the nature of the federal equity power. This Article offers a bold new approach to understanding the nature and limits of the federal equity power. There is no single body of equity law that federal courts must apply in all cases that come before them. In cases arising under state law, there is no basis in the Constitution, federal law, or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for courts to impose their own equitable standards for relief. Rights and remedies are inextricably intertwined. The manner in which state-created rights are protected is as much a matter of substantive state policy as the state’s initial creation and allocation of those rights. A federal court must apply state statutes and precedents — not uniform, centrally devised federal standards — to determine the availability of equitable relief for state-law claims.Conversely, for cases arising under federal statutes, the equitable principles that apply are a question of statutory interpretation. When a federal law authorizes equitable relief, a court may presume Congress intended to incorporate traditional equitable principles, absent a clear statement to the contrary in the law's text or legislative history. And for constitutional cases, federal courts may presumptively apply traditional equitable principles as a matter of constitutional common law, unless Congress chooses to displace it. Thus, contrary to received wisdom, there is no single federal equity law. The scope of equitable relief a federal court may afford depends on the underlying law from which a claim arose." @default.
- W3124552275 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3124552275 creator A5054537805 @default.
- W3124552275 date "2018-01-01" @default.
- W3124552275 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3124552275 title "The Federal Equity Power" @default.
- W3124552275 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W3124552275 type Work @default.
- W3124552275 sameAs 3124552275 @default.
- W3124552275 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3124552275 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3124552275 hasAuthorship W3124552275A5054537805 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C2776449231 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C2777006572 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C2780598601 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C3020037990 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C533735693 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C158129432 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C17319257 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C17744445 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C199539241 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C199728807 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C2776449231 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C2776949292 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C2777006572 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C2777351106 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C2778272461 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C2780598601 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C3020037990 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C533735693 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C87501996 @default.
- W3124552275 hasConceptScore W3124552275C94625758 @default.
- W3124552275 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3124552275 hasLocation W31245522751 @default.
- W3124552275 hasOpenAccess W3124552275 @default.
- W3124552275 hasPrimaryLocation W31245522751 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W1480908437 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W1484932429 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W1517106021 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W1548044137 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W1586090806 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W2235298566 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W2256213434 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W2591780328 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W284520908 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W2886731893 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3047828029 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W305095276 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W311935743 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3122566730 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3123297132 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3123316665 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3150889215 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3185272659 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W3213811790 @default.
- W3124552275 hasRelatedWork W78610439 @default.
- W3124552275 hasVolume "59" @default.
- W3124552275 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3124552275 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3124552275 magId "3124552275" @default.
- W3124552275 workType "article" @default.