FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124585303> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124585303 startingPage "1" @default.
• W3124585303 abstract "Abstract: Although abortion jurisprudence under Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey condones State efforts to persuade woman to forego an abortion in favor of childbirth, opinion's and not misleading language can be read more broadly than it traditionally has. Specifically, even truthful message may mislead when it inappropriately takes advantage of emotional influence to bias an individual's decision away from decision that would be made in non-emotional, fully state. Drawing on empirical research in social sciences, I suggest that sort of emotional information that many states now provide in their informed statutes can lead to such inappropriate emotional influence and thus should be examined more closely than heretofore. This broader reading, taking into account empirical research that gives better idea of individual decisionmaking, suggests that states' consent statutes have potential to be an impermissible burden on exercise of woman's autonomous decision-making about an abortion precisely because they bias woman's free choice, not inform it. INTRODUCTION In 1981, U.S. Court of Appeals for First Circuit reviewed Massachusetts statute that required woman seeking an abortion to sign standardized consent form that included, among other specified elements, a description of stage of development of fetus.1 Relying in part on uncontradicted expert testimony heard in by court below, Court held that such information, even though factually accurate,2 could cause many women emotional distress, anxiety, and guilt, and was, moreover, not directly material to any medically relevant fact.3 As such, First Circuit held that this information's potential to cause emotional distress and consequently to burden woman's decision-making constituted an impermissible obstacle to her efforts to seek an abortion; therefore, court ruled requirement unconstitutional.4 Before U.S. Supreme Court's 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey,5 such holding was not atypical. Previous federal courts had so ruled when evaluating statutes requiring that more graphic or detailed information be presented.6 And Supreme Court had twice held similarly, in City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health7 and Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists? characterizing such information as involving parade of horribles and, citing First Circuit's opinion approvingly, as inflammatory.9 Casey, however, changed this approach. In Casey, State of Pennsylvania had mandated that doctor provide, at least twenty-four hours before performing an abortion, particular information regarding the nature of procedure, health risks of abortion and of childbirth, and 'probable gestational age of unborn child.'10 Further, Pennsylvania statute required that doctor make additional printed material available that, in part, described fetus.11 No abortion could be performed unless woman acknowledged in writing that she had been that these materials were available.12 The goal of this information was, ostensibly, to further State's interest in obtaining woman's fully consent,13 and Court approved Pennsylvania's approach. In this way, Casey condoned state's requirement of informed of woman seeking an abortion.14 Of course, Casey made evident Pennsylvania's effort in this context to use such information to encourage women not to pursue decision to abort,15 politicized effort that Akron and Thornburgh had rejected.16 Casey overruled those cases' holdings that State could not provide specific information 'designed to influence woman's choice between abortion or childbirth.'17 Thus, Casey condoned state's use of consent requirement as vehicle for express[ing] preference for childbirth over abortion. …" @default.
• W3124585303 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124585303 creator A5028499168 @default.
• W3124585303 date "2008-02-01" @default.
• W3124585303 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3124585303 title "Abortion, Persuasion, and Emotion: Implications of Social Science Research on Emotion for Reading Casey" @default.
• W3124585303 cites W1530457238 @default.
• W3124585303 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W3124585303 type Work @default.
• W3124585303 sameAs 3124585303 @default.
• W3124585303 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3124585303 countsByYear W31245853032015 @default.
• W3124585303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3124585303 hasAuthorship W3124585303A5028499168 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C2781310500 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C15744967 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C17319257 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C17744445 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C199539241 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C2778272461 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C2778642596 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C2779234561 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C2781310500 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C54355233 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C554936623 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C71043370 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C77805123 @default.
• W3124585303 hasConceptScore W3124585303C86803240 @default.
• W3124585303 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3124585303 hasLocation W31245853031 @default.
• W3124585303 hasOpenAccess W3124585303 @default.
• W3124585303 hasPrimaryLocation W31245853031 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W1991077721 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2008530141 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2062669748 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2146002214 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2236252247 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2402752094 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2411772440 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2466420513 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2575312795 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2604445764 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W271507124 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W2989718510 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W3040746455 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W3123257170 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W3124757400 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W3125787463 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W3126049620 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W322934016 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W68693158 @default.
• W3124585303 hasRelatedWork W89248438 @default.
• W3124585303 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W3124585303 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124585303 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124585303 magId "3124585303" @default.
• W3124585303 workType "article" @default.