FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124782014> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124782014 endingPage "127005" @default.
• W3124782014 startingPage "127005" @default.
• W3124782014 abstract "The urban trees must be properly evaluated to ensure their presence with acceptable risk levels, so that they provide ecosystem services. However, most Latin American countries lack their own or adaptations methods for this evaluation. To identify the applicability of some methods in Montevideo (Uruguay), the following were evaluated: A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas (ISA/M&C); Best Management Practices - Tree Risk Assessment (ISA/BMP); Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA); Tree Hazard: Risk Evaluation and Treatment System (THREATS); Guide to Hazard Tree Management (USDA1); A Guide to Identifying, Assessing and Managing Hazard Trees in Developed Recreational Sites of the Northern Rocky Mountains and the Intermountain West (USDA2). The methods were organized by the components: likelihood of failure, likelihood of impact, consequence of failure and risk rating, and were applied by two types of assessors to trees of Eucalyptus and Tipuana. A generalized linear mixed model was applied, identifying significant differences between methods, assessors, genus, and their interactions. The results showed that there were significant differences amidst the methods, for all components. There were significant differences between assessors for the likelihood of failure and the risk rating, and a method x type of assessor interaction, associated with the consequence of failure. There were no significant differences between genus, however, there was a genus x method interaction for the likelihood of impact. The part size interpretation on the consequence analysis explained the differences between assessors for the QTRA, USDA1 and ISA/M&C methods; the location of trees presented greater influence in the likelihood of impact on the USDA2 method. In this context, to monitor and carry out tree management for urban parks of Montevideo, it is recommended to apply the unchanged ISA/BMP method. The QTRA and USDA1 methods also presented good applicability, but they should be adjusted." @default.
• W3124782014 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124782014 creator A5006102063 @default.
• W3124782014 creator A5015301329 @default.
• W3124782014 creator A5038895941 @default.
• W3124782014 creator A5056090595 @default.
• W3124782014 creator A5057363768 @default.
• W3124782014 date "2021-04-01" @default.
• W3124782014 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3124782014 title "Tree Risk Assessment: Component analysis of six visual methods applied in an urban park, Montevideo, Uruguay" @default.
• W3124782014 cites W1453003958 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W1999405543 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2062923070 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2064375044 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2070947278 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2082871896 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2095375472 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2111841011 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2122167509 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2175156545 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2479296670 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2600528232 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2607285630 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2884164919 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W2943738448 @default.
• W3124782014 cites W3119248412 @default.
• W3124782014 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127005" @default.
• W3124782014 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3124782014 type Work @default.
• W3124782014 sameAs 3124782014 @default.
• W3124782014 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3124782014 countsByYear W31247820142021 @default.
• W3124782014 countsByYear W31247820142022 @default.
• W3124782014 countsByYear W31247820142023 @default.
• W3124782014 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3124782014 hasAuthorship W3124782014A5006102063 @default.
• W3124782014 hasAuthorship W3124782014A5015301329 @default.
• W3124782014 hasAuthorship W3124782014A5038895941 @default.
• W3124782014 hasAuthorship W3124782014A5056090595 @default.
• W3124782014 hasAuthorship W3124782014A5057363768 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C110269972 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C49261128 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C110269972 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C12174686 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C18903297 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C205649164 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C38652104 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C41008148 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C49261128 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C86803240 @default.
• W3124782014 hasConceptScore W3124782014C97137747 @default.
• W3124782014 hasFunder F4320335090 @default.
• W3124782014 hasLocation W31247820141 @default.
• W3124782014 hasOpenAccess W3124782014 @default.
• W3124782014 hasPrimaryLocation W31247820141 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W154798464 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W1721779379 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2074616562 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2184653530 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2239474588 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2365005889 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2379028491 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2462570935 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W2563286002 @default.
• W3124782014 hasRelatedWork W3174711023 @default.
• W3124782014 hasVolume "59" @default.
• W3124782014 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124782014 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124782014 magId "3124782014" @default.
• W3124782014 workType "article" @default.