FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124837108> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124837108 endingPage "1877" @default.
• W3124837108 startingPage "1787" @default.
• W3124837108 abstract "U.S. public law has long taken slavery and Jim Crow segregation as a paradigm case through which to understand our constitutional law: cases adjudicating issues of slavery and segregation form the keystones of our constitutional canon. Reconstruction, or the so-called “Second Founding,” and the Civil Rights Era periodize our constitutional histories. Slavery and Jim Crow segregation supply normative lessons about the strengths and failings of our constitutional framework. This paradigm teaches that if there is too much power in the states and not enough limitation on state power in the form of national power or rights, America might again reenact similar atrocities. Although there is much to learn from the United States’ tragic history with slavery and Jim Crow segregation, resting our public law on this binary paradigm has led to incomplete models and theories. This Nation’s tragic history of colonialism and violent dispossession of Native lands, resources, culture, and even children offers different, yet equally important, lessons about our constitutional framework.In this Article, I argue for a more inclusive paradigm that reaches beyond the black/white binary, and I highlight the centrality of federal Indian law and this Nation’s tragic history with colonialism to public law. Currently, to the extent that federal Indian law is discussed at all within public law, it is generally considered sui generis and consigned to a “tiny backwater.” While I concede that the colonial status of Native peoples and the recognition of inherent tribal sovereignty do render aspects of federal Indian law exceptional, federal Indian law and Native history have much to teach about reimagining the constitutional history of the United States. Interactions between the national government and Native Nations have shaped the warp and woof of our constitutional law from the Founding across a range of substantive areas, including vertical and horizontal separation of powers, the Treaty Clause, war powers, executive powers in times of exigency, and many others. I aim to open a conversation as to whether these doctrines ought to take their rightful place in the canon or, perhaps, the anticanon.Beyond simple canonization, federal Indian law offers paradigmatic lessons about the strengths and failings of our constitutional framework. Broadening the binary paradigm to include federal Indian law could allow interventions into a range of general principles of public law. It has often been said that federal Indian law is “incoherent” and in need of reform, because the doctrine does not comport with general public law principles. But perhaps it is the general principles of public law, and the incomplete paradigm of slavery and Jim Crow segregation on which those principles rest, that are in need of reform.More than simple canonization, the inclusion of federal Indian law as an additional paradigm case could lead to fundamental reformulation. A full catalogue is beyond the scope of this Article, but I offer an example here in the hope that it will invite more. As I’ll show, federal Indian law leads public law to a very different set of principles in the context of minority protection, unsettling reigning theories of how best to distribute and limit power in order to prevent government abuse of minorities. Unlike slavery and Jim Crow segregation, federal Indian law teaches that nationalism is no panacea for majority tyranny, and that rights can wound as well as shield minorities." @default.
• W3124837108 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124837108 creator A5023802881 @default.
• W3124837108 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W3124837108 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3124837108 title "Federal Indian Law as Paradigm Within Public Law" @default.
• W3124837108 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3124837108 type Work @default.
• W3124837108 sameAs 3124837108 @default.
• W3124837108 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3124837108 countsByYear W31248371082020 @default.
• W3124837108 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3124837108 hasAuthorship W3124837108A5023802881 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C186229450 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C18650270 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C2780755764 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C30730545 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C531593650 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C121332964 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C144024400 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C163258240 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C17744445 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C177986884 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C186229450 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C18650270 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C199539241 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C2780755764 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C30730545 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C531593650 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C62520636 @default.
• W3124837108 hasConceptScore W3124837108C94625758 @default.
• W3124837108 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3124837108 hasLocation W31248371081 @default.
• W3124837108 hasOpenAccess W3124837108 @default.
• W3124837108 hasPrimaryLocation W31248371081 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W100383747 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W1484448219 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W1517692008 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W166133280 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W1688903327 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W1893190904 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W193110485 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W2290464109 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W2499390229 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W260228260 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W2896832837 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W2898360706 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W2921321636 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W2968493465 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W3122679275 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W3124344269 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W3124704410 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W3125886351 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W81831844 @default.
• W3124837108 hasRelatedWork W948054083 @default.
• W3124837108 hasVolume "132" @default.
• W3124837108 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124837108 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124837108 magId "3124837108" @default.
• W3124837108 workType "article" @default.