FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3124969784> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3124969784 startingPage "213" @default.
• W3124969784 abstract "In the Supreme Court's 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., justice Antonin Scalia ziting for a unanimous Court partially achieved his goal of abolishing the prudential standing doctrne. First, the Court concluded that the zone of interests test concerns whether Congress has authorized a particular plaintiff to sue and is not a prudential standing question despite several Court decisions classifying it as such. However, there is a continuing controversy in the D.C. Circuit about applying the test to suits by competitors, especially in environmental cases. The better approach is to allow competitor standing in at Least some environmental cases because even self-interested suits may advance the environmental purposes of the applicable statutes. Second, the Court held that its limitations on generalized grievances suits is based on constitutional Article III standing requirements and not the prudential standing principles relied in some of the Court's previous cases. Yet it is not clear that treating limitations on generalized grievances as Article III standing requirements will preclude taxpayer suits, voting rights cases or climate change litigation, especially if the Court's composition changes. Finally, the Court did not resolve the issue of whether limitations on third-party standing are based on prudential standing or other grounds. If the Court precludes third-party suits, however, it should recognize that some challengers have a sufficient personal Article III injury in protecting the various constitutional rights at issue in those cases, although the differing circumstances in various third-pany standing cases likely preclude a single easy rule. Justice Scalia in theory eliminated two of the three major prongs of prudential standing endorsed by the Court in a 2004 decision. However, a more liberal future Supreme Court yight be able to revive prudential standing in practice, ifnot name, without overruling Lexmark. James Helmer, Jr. Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law, P.O. Box 210040, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0040, Telephone 513-556-0094, Fax 513-556-1236, e-mail: brad.mank@uc.edu. I thank Michael Solimine and my other faculty colleagues attending aJune 2014 presentation of an early draft of this Article. All errors or omissions are my responsibility. This Article is one of a series of explorations of modern standing doctrines. The other pieces are (1) Bradford C. Mank, Should States Have Greater Standing Rights Than Ordinary Citizens?: Massachusetts v. EPA's New Standing Test for States, 49 WM. & MARY L. REv. 1701 (2008) [hereinafter Mank, States Standing]; (2) Bradford C. Mank, Standing and Future Generations: Does Massachusetts v. EPA Open Standing for Generations to Come?, 34 COLUM.J. ENVTL. L. 1 (2009); (3) Bradford C. Mank, Standing and Statistical Persons: A Risk-Based Approach to Standing, 36 ECOLoGY L.Q. 665 (2009) [hereinafter Mank, Standing and Statistical Persons]; (4) Bradford C. Mank, Summers v. Earth Island Institute Rejects Probabiliviic Standing, But a Realistic Threat of Harm is a Better Standing Test, 40 ENvTL. L. 89 (2010); (5) Bradford C. Mank, Revisiting the Lyons Den: Summers v. Earth Island Institute's Misuse of Lyons 's Realistic Threat of Harm Standing Test, 42 ARIZ. ST. L.J 837 (2010); (6) Bradford C. Mank, Summers v. Earth Island Institute: Its Implicaionsfor Future StandingDecisions, 40" @default.
• W3124969784 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3124969784 creator A5012958341 @default.
• W3124969784 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W3124969784 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3124969784 title "Prudential Standing Doctrine Abolished or Waiting for a Comeback?: Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc." @default.
• W3124969784 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W3124969784 type Work @default.
• W3124969784 sameAs 3124969784 @default.
• W3124969784 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3124969784 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3124969784 hasAuthorship W3124969784A5012958341 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C2776360696 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C2779518780 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C520049643 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C139621336 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C169437150 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C17319257 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C17744445 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C199539241 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C2776211767 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C2776360696 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C2778272461 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C2779518780 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C520049643 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C94625758 @default.
• W3124969784 hasConceptScore W3124969784C97460637 @default.
• W3124969784 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3124969784 hasLocation W31249697841 @default.
• W3124969784 hasOpenAccess W3124969784 @default.
• W3124969784 hasPrimaryLocation W31249697841 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W117039841 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W2262966613 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W2612797970 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W2898199200 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W2914818387 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3121678519 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3122075864 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3123271657 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3123849122 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3123852136 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3124174024 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3124314194 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3125951956 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3178936066 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3204306811 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W344098057 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W1652792228 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W1845636708 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3124897456 @default.
• W3124969784 hasRelatedWork W3125351379 @default.
• W3124969784 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W3124969784 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3124969784 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3124969784 magId "3124969784" @default.
• W3124969784 workType "article" @default.