Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125063766> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 63 of
63
with 100 items per page.
- W3125063766 abstract "According to prevailing interpretations of the Warren Court’s Due Process Revolution, the Supreme Court constitutionalized criminal procedure to constrain the discretion of individual officers. These narratives, however, fail to account for the Court’s decisions during that revolutionary period that enabled discretionary policing. Instead of beginning with the Warren Court, this Essay looks to the legal culture before the Due Process Revolution to provide a more coherent synthesis of the Court’s criminal procedure decisions. It reconstructs that culture by analyzing the prominent criminal law scholar Jerome Hall’s public lectures, Police and Law in a Democratic Society, which he delivered in 1952 on the differences between democratic and totalitarian police forces. Hall’s definition of democratic policing appealed to self-rule, then to the rule of law, and finally, to due process, as he struggled to account for twentieth-century police forces that were not, in important ways, governed by the people or entirely constrained by law. Hall ultimately settled on the idea that in a democratic society due process meant that the police did not decide the outcome of a “fair trial”—a definition that is different from today’s understanding of due process, which emphasizes judicial review of police action. The Essay applies the methodology of cultural history to argue that during the Cold War, Hall articulated a concept of due process that was not just a legal norm but also a cultural value that rationalized discretionary policing and served to distinguish two competing systems of government that both relied on discretionary authority. The Essay concludes by exploring how Hall’s explication of due process, which was representative of midcentury views, might revise standard accounts of the Due Process Revolution. Understanding the legal culture that came before—and informed—the Warren Court’s criminal procedure decisions suggests that due process functioned as much to justify as to restrain police discretion." @default.
- W3125063766 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3125063766 creator A5018963299 @default.
- W3125063766 date "2018-06-16" @default.
- W3125063766 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3125063766 title "Democratic Policing Before the Due Process Revolution" @default.
- W3125063766 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W3125063766 type Work @default.
- W3125063766 sameAs 3125063766 @default.
- W3125063766 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3125063766 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W3125063766 hasAuthorship W3125063766A5018963299 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C191795146 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C2776847301 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C30048959 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C504945742 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C8705443 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C144024400 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C149209484 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C17744445 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C191795146 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C199539241 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C2776847301 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C2777632292 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C2778272461 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C30048959 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C504945742 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C555826173 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C8705443 @default.
- W3125063766 hasConceptScore W3125063766C94625758 @default.
- W3125063766 hasOpenAccess W3125063766 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W1567577599 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W1573284875 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W1923524557 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W2470119128 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W2502140166 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W260228260 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W2886579315 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W2910699763 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3014694906 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3083951752 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3109367781 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3121452927 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3121948047 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3122679275 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3126372435 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3169873498 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3173645892 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3199219580 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3204521290 @default.
- W3125063766 hasRelatedWork W3123840199 @default.
- W3125063766 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3125063766 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3125063766 magId "3125063766" @default.
- W3125063766 workType "article" @default.