FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125214392> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3125214392 startingPage "419" @default.
• W3125214392 abstract "Abstract: This Article, written for the Washington Law Review's 2013 Symposium, The Disclosure Crisis, argues that hidden sponsorship creates a form of non-actionable influence rather than causing legally cognizable deception that mandatory disclosure can and should cure. The Article identifies and calls into question three widely held assumptions underpinning much of the regulation of embedded advertising, or hidden sponsorship, in artistic communications. The first assumption is that advertising can be meaningfully discerned and separated from communicative content for the purposes of mandating disclosure, even when such advertising occurs in speech. The second assumption is that the hidden promotional aspects of hybrid speech create a form of legally cognizable deception. The final assumption holds that disclosure is normatively desirable, to inform audiences of hybrid speech of its hybridity, and in so doing, to remedy the perceived harms that flow from hidden sponsorship. The Article challenges these three assumptions by using as an example the little-remarked phenomenon of sponsored literature, literary texts in and around which advertising is inserted, as well as literary texts that owe their existence to commissioning advertisers. The standard disclosure literature does not consider contexts such as these, in which the decision-making process does not involve crucial questions of life or death, shelter or homelessness, solvency or bankruptcy. Thus the entertainment context of hybrid speech demands different regulatory treatment. The Article concludes that mandatory disclosure is the wrong regulatory response to hidden sponsorship because the harms that it ostensibly creates are rooted in influence, rather than deception.INTRODUCTIONThis Article, written for the Washington Law Review's 2013 Symposium, The Disclosure Crisis, argues that hidden sponsorship creates a form of non-actionable influence rather than causing legally cognizable deception that mandatory disclosure can and should cure. The Article identifies and calls into question three widely held assumptions underpinning much regulation of embedded advertising. In particular, it takes aim at the central mechanism by which such regulation seeks to remedy any harms perceived to emanate from hidden sponsorship: disclosure. It challenges these three assumptions by using a previously unexamined terrain for sponsorship: literature. Sponsored literature consists of literary texts in and around which advertising is inserted, as well as literary texts that owe their existence to commissioning advertisers.The Article applies these three central assumptions to sponsored literature and concludes that collectively, these assumptions should be revisited and either abandoned, or more thoroughly theorized and justified. At present, these assumptions are naive, mistaken, or otherwise indefensible. In turn, undermining these assumptions weakens the case on behalf of mandated disclosure for the influence ostensibly exerted by embedded advertising, or the insertion of promotional products or messages in artistic content.1The first assumption is that advertising can be meaningfully discerned and separated from communicative content for the purposes of mandating disclosure, even when advertising occurs in expressive or artistic content; that is, even when it occurs in what we could call speech.2 Hybrid speech refers to collaboration between advertisers and content producers in the creation of content that is functionally a hybrid of promotional and artistic messages.3 The second assumption, which builds on the first, is that the hidden promotional aspects of hybrid speech create a form of legally cognizable deception. The final assumption also builds on the first, and it reflects a long history of regulatory and legislative action. It relies on the notion that disclosure is normatively desirable in that it informs audiences of hybrid speech of its hybridity and it delineates the respective contributions from both content creators and sponsors. …" @default.
• W3125214392 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3125214392 creator A5064120858 @default.
• W3125214392 date "2013-06-01" @default.
• W3125214392 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3125214392 title "Mandated Disclosure in Literary Hybrid Speech" @default.
• W3125214392 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W3125214392 type Work @default.
• W3125214392 sameAs 3125214392 @default.
• W3125214392 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3125214392 countsByYear W31252143922014 @default.
• W3125214392 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3125214392 hasAuthorship W3125214392A5064120858 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C2776156098 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C2779267917 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C112698675 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C144024400 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C144133560 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C166957645 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C17744445 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C190253527 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C199539241 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C2776156098 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C2778272461 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C2779267917 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C2779343474 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C2994536602 @default.
• W3125214392 hasConceptScore W3125214392C95457728 @default.
• W3125214392 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3125214392 hasLocation W31252143921 @default.
• W3125214392 hasOpenAccess W3125214392 @default.
• W3125214392 hasPrimaryLocation W31252143921 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1488000778 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1491073451 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1550928102 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1551101530 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1557368633 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1574654475 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1584189089 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1598986769 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W1941086806 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W2247048794 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W2249520276 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W2462332286 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W2797413222 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W2914580847 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W2924952955 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W3035081694 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W3121186794 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W3125952900 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W3191946426 @default.
• W3125214392 hasRelatedWork W817402224 @default.
• W3125214392 hasVolume "88" @default.
• W3125214392 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3125214392 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3125214392 magId "3125214392" @default.
• W3125214392 workType "article" @default.