FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125333524> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3125333524 abstract "To understand the spread of bloodborne viruses in injection drug users (IDUs), it is important to ascertain networks of injection contact. However, in retrospective interviews, IDUs often forget many injection partners. We compared retrospective recall with daily reporting.We gave mobile phones to 14 IDUs who had participated in the first daily reporting study of the project. For four weeks, participants reported their injection partners in automated daily telephone interviews. Then, in a retrospective interview, they recalled their partners from the four-week period and received location and network cues to enhance recall. The 11 participants who reported partners in the daily interviews missed 3.4 (out of 28) such interviews on average. In the daily reports, they listed a mean of 6.4 unique partners. In the retrospective interview, they recalled a mean of 5.1 partners, including a mean of 0.8 in response to the recall cues (a 17% increase on average). One-third of cue-elicited partners were mentioned in the daily reports. In the retrospective interview, participants forgot 2.7 partners on average, and listed a mean of 1.5 partners not in the daily reports (perhaps partners on days with missing daily reports). The total number of partners reported at follow-up was moderately positively correlated with the total number of unique partners reported during the daily interviews (r = 0.66, intraclass correlation = 0.64). There was some under- and over-reporting of partnership risk at follow-up, relative to risk reported in the daily interviews, which could be due to missing daily reports and misreporting at follow-up, respectively. Other results mirrored prior research on correlates of forgetting. First, the number of partners freely recalled at follow-up correlated moderately positively with the number of partners elicited by the recall cues (r = 0.52). Second, forgotten partnerships involved, on average, slightly less risk and slightly greater injection frequency. Forgotten partnerships were moderately less recent, though still within the 28-day study period, and one-third of forgotten partnerships occurred within 14 days of the follow-up interview. In conclusion, daily reporting of injection partners is feasible and may be a useful adjunct to retrospective recall in some situations. The replication of the recall cues' effectiveness suggests that such techniques should be used as standard practice in injection network elicitation." @default.
• W3125333524 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3125333524 creator A5029068679 @default.
• W3125333524 creator A5062349673 @default.
• W3125333524 creator A5088120882 @default.
• W3125333524 date "2012-10-10" @default.
• W3125333524 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3125333524 title "Comparison of daily reports and retrospective recall for eliciting drug injection partners" @default.
• W3125333524 doi "https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1092625.1" @default.
• W3125333524 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W3125333524 type Work @default.
• W3125333524 sameAs 3125333524 @default.
• W3125333524 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3125333524 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3125333524 hasAuthorship W3125333524A5029068679 @default.
• W3125333524 hasAuthorship W3125333524A5062349673 @default.
• W3125333524 hasAuthorship W3125333524A5088120882 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C2778834376 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C100660578 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C126322002 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C144024400 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C149923435 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C15744967 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C167135981 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C180747234 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C2778834376 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C36289849 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C512399662 @default.
• W3125333524 hasConceptScore W3125333524C71924100 @default.
• W3125333524 hasLocation W31253335241 @default.
• W3125333524 hasOpenAccess W3125333524 @default.
• W3125333524 hasPrimaryLocation W31253335241 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W115186444 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W1983378303 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2002180219 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2073459236 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2100362074 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2117891912 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2140178699 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2263205284 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2297909727 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2412177591 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2514080251 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2775320579 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2894121403 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2912444155 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2943283207 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W3006637811 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W3134230050 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W3191732413 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W2085718375 @default.
• W3125333524 hasRelatedWork W3161288985 @default.
• W3125333524 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W3125333524 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3125333524 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3125333524 magId "3125333524" @default.
• W3125333524 workType "article" @default.