FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125439718> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3125439718 abstract "Greenhouse gases have never been given their rightful place at the regulatory table. Despite the statute’s text and legislative history, anti-regulation groups have consistently argued that the modern Clean Air Act does not apply to these contaminants. In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Court held that greenhouse gases are air pollutants for the purposes of the Clean Air Act. Thereafter, the Environmental Protection Agency found that greenhouse gases “endanger” public health and welfare and, thus, could be regulated under the Act. These two events should have definitively resolved the issue. Instead, greenhouse gases have been subjected to a double standard and treated as regulatory pariahs. Perhaps motivated by the presence of four dissenters in Massachusetts v. EPA, opponents of greenhouse gas regulation have pushed hard during the last decade to limit the reach of that case, even though no such limitation could fairly be derived from the decision’s text. They have also raised ill-defined and amorphous “major question” roadblocks that are at odds with the structure of the Clean Air Act.The Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County opened the door to ending this pernicious greenhouse gas exceptionalism, and ensured that, going forward, greenhouse gases are treated like all other pollutants that meet the requirements for regulation. Although the majority and the two dissents in Bostock set forth different interpretive approaches for how to deal with a half-century-old statute, the interpretive reasoning of each approach, if applied to the Clean Air Act, reinforces the appropriateness of greenhouse gas regulation. Guided by the blueprint of all three Bostock opinions, this Article performs a deep dive into the legislative materials surrounding the enactment of the Clean Air Act of 1970, uncovering a treasure trove of sources that had not previously been part of the public discourse. It shows how, under the interpretive approach of each of the three opinions, greenhouse gases are unquestionably pollutants for the purposes of the Clean Air Act. Because the approaches in the majority and dissents in Bostock—and thus a majority of the current Court—all point in the same direction, the era of greenhouse gas exceptionalism should now be over." @default.
• W3125439718 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3125439718 creator A5078400554 @default.
• W3125439718 date "2020-12-30" @default.
• W3125439718 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3125439718 title "Bostock and the End of the Climate Change Double Standard" @default.
• W3125439718 doi "https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v46i1.7794" @default.
• W3125439718 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3125439718 type Work @default.
• W3125439718 sameAs 3125439718 @default.
• W3125439718 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3125439718 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3125439718 hasAuthorship W3125439718A5078400554 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C2777404476 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C47737302 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C559116025 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C17319257 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C17744445 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C178790620 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C185592680 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C18903297 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C199539241 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C2777351106 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C2777404476 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C2778272461 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C47737302 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C559116025 @default.
• W3125439718 hasConceptScore W3125439718C86803240 @default.
• W3125439718 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3125439718 hasLocation W31254397181 @default.
• W3125439718 hasOpenAccess W3125439718 @default.
• W3125439718 hasPrimaryLocation W31254397181 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W1482633195 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2010422329 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2083702105 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2093871306 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2107684637 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2146611979 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2319113420 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2338126901 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W2586459425 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3025476814 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3035675901 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W307185378 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3121250945 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3121866760 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3123018843 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3133062604 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W3198003707 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W750990538 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W119776439 @default.
• W3125439718 hasRelatedWork W1655882421 @default.
• W3125439718 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W3125439718 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3125439718 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3125439718 magId "3125439718" @default.
• W3125439718 workType "article" @default.