FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125494673> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3125494673 endingPage "068" @default.
• W3125494673 startingPage "041" @default.
• W3125494673 abstract "Private dispute resolution processes are an increasingly established global phenomenon. Some processes, like international commercial arbitration, have been formally in pace for more than a century and draw upon clear principles of law and contract. Arbitrators and parties are guided by relevant treatises, procedural rules, and well-settled practices. Other international dispute resolution processes, like negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and coaching, similarly have a long history and some process guidance. However, by their very nature, these non-adjudicative, cooperative processes are multidimensional, fluid, and complex. They require the intervener, parties, and their representatives to engage with one another in ways that go beyond the law and well into the realm of human relations. In order to make the best use of such cooperative processes, interveners, parties, and representatives - hereafter conflict - draw upon knowledge, insights, and skills related to communication, culture, history, language, philosophy, psychology, and sociology, among many other fields. They also draw upon their own professional and personal lived experience. As cooperative private international dispute resolution practices become increasingly common, it is tempting for practitioners to assume that the human relations insights, skills, and practices that worked well for them at home will be equally effective (and appropriate) in an international, cross-cultural environment. However, exporting the ways we understand and interact with others in form a domestic environment into new and different legal, political, economic, cultural, and environments can be problematic. At best, exporting our set ideas and practices can lead to missed insights and lost opportunities for better solutions to the disputes at hand. At worst, this practice can exacerbate disputes, causing greater confusion, more deeply entrenched conflict, and less likelihood of resolution. As a result, attending to the human dimension of and interaction should be a central part of global negotiation and dispute resolution practice. That is the focus of this essay. Working in the global dispute resolution environment puts into clear relief the need for practitioners to be attuned to themselves and to their counterparts in ways that might not have been apparent in local practice. As mentioned above, this attunement goes beyond technical legal knowledge and skills. It also includes being attuned to the subtle and complex human, cultural, linguistic, and other relational dimensions of working across worlds. One way to be so attuned is to develop reflective and reflexive practice - intentionally seeking to learn and grow from one's past experience (reflection-on-action) and developing multiple dimensions of as the interaction actually unfolds (reflection-in-action). This essay focuses on these two dimensions of reflective and reflexive practice, In the next part, the author discusses the nature of reflection-on-action and reflection-in-action from a (reflective) and postmodern (reflexive) perspective. These modern and postmodern concepts of reflective and reflexive practice parallel a growing trend in the literature from a modernist to a postmodern or social constructionist orientation to understanding itself. In the final part, the author examines how engaging with practice reflexively reveals additional dimensions of about ourselves, other parties, and the context. I then bring together the elements of reflective and reflexive practice to articulate a more holistic conception of awareness that can help practitioners more purposefully learn from past experience and develop greater as interactions unfold." @default.
• W3125494673 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3125494673 creator A5087250186 @default.
• W3125494673 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W3125494673 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3125494673 title "Mirror as Prism: Reimagining Reflexive Dispute Resolution Practice in a Globalized World" @default.
• W3125494673 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W3125494673 type Work @default.
• W3125494673 sameAs 3125494673 @default.
• W3125494673 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3125494673 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3125494673 hasAuthorship W3125494673A5087250186 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C131676636 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C13200473 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C139997747 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C160151201 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C162199757 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C167054989 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C175762713 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C179420905 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C21711469 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C131676636 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C13200473 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C139997747 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C144024400 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C160151201 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C162199757 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C167054989 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C175762713 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C17744445 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C179420905 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C190253527 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C199539241 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C199776023 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C21711469 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C36289849 @default.
• W3125494673 hasConceptScore W3125494673C39549134 @default.
• W3125494673 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3125494673 hasLocation W31254946731 @default.
• W3125494673 hasOpenAccess W3125494673 @default.
• W3125494673 hasPrimaryLocation W31254946731 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W136587240 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W1556485660 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W1574442310 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W1608834744 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W1972285863 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2023199476 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2029585660 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2098580737 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2132310112 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2182268520 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2238042574 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2291661826 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2462624367 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2604579870 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2709212513 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2954335813 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W30245455 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W3134370112 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W585478760 @default.
• W3125494673 hasRelatedWork W2777492656 @default.
• W3125494673 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W3125494673 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3125494673 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3125494673 magId "3125494673" @default.
• W3125494673 workType "article" @default.