Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125527433> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W3125527433 startingPage "925" @default.
- W3125527433 abstract "Almost from the moment that the Supreme Court abandoned the religious exemption doctrine in Employment Division v. Smith, its defenders have worked to bring it back. More than a decade later, however, Smith remains well-entrenched; not only has the Court confirmed Smith's basic holding, but it also struck the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Congress's first effort to restore the exemption doctrine, at least as it applied to the states.Proponents of religious exemptions cannot ignore the hard truth that they can no longer be defended. During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, American society viewed the practice of religion-mostly Christian or Judeo-Christian religion-as an especially good activity entitled to special privileges and to be encouraged by government. This understanding of religious practices has been displaced by an understanding that has reduced religious practices to a personal preference that is to be neither encouraged nor discouraged by government. In terms of its social place and importance, contemporary belief enjoys no greater cultural status than a number of indisputably secular activities. In this cultural environment, it is difficult to justify giving religious practices special constitutional protection that is not afforded to morally serious and socially valuable secular activities.In light of the new and diminished place of religion, religious practice should receive only the constitutional protection afforded to expression and association under the Speech and Equal Protection Clauses. Incidental restriction, time, place, and manner regulation, and prior restraint of religious activity should be handled doctrinally in the same way that such restrictions, regulations, and restraints of expression are dealt with by the Speech Clause. Likewise, burdens imposed on religious practices by underinclusive but nonsuspect classifications should be handled doctrinally in the same way that such burdens on fundamental rights are dealt with under the Equal Protection Clause. These constitutional analogues suggest a plausible, defensible, and meaningful doctrine that takes account of the place of religion in contemporary society." @default.
- W3125527433 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3125527433 creator A5090496054 @default.
- W3125527433 date "2000-01-01" @default.
- W3125527433 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3125527433 title "Towards a Defensible Free Exercise Doctrine" @default.
- W3125527433 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W3125527433 type Work @default.
- W3125527433 sameAs 3125527433 @default.
- W3125527433 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3125527433 countsByYear W31255274332014 @default.
- W3125527433 countsByYear W31255274332015 @default.
- W3125527433 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3125527433 hasAuthorship W3125527433A5090496054 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C104636517 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2778323131 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2778890055 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2780300103 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C104636517 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C138885662 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C144024400 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C17744445 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C199539241 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2776211767 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2778137410 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2778272461 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2778323131 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2778890055 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2780300103 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C2994536602 @default.
- W3125527433 hasConceptScore W3125527433C41895202 @default.
- W3125527433 hasLocation W31255274331 @default.
- W3125527433 hasOpenAccess W3125527433 @default.
- W3125527433 hasPrimaryLocation W31255274331 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W143839268 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2114772031 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2253117902 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2264621186 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2279161233 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2284652353 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2321088465 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2337529531 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W240797760 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2494060584 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2793486672 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2899658956 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W2991748299 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W3037322600 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W3122307738 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W3124147254 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W3124848897 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W3126092806 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W3128028852 @default.
- W3125527433 hasRelatedWork W615709356 @default.
- W3125527433 hasVolume "68" @default.
- W3125527433 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3125527433 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3125527433 magId "3125527433" @default.
- W3125527433 workType "article" @default.