Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125551696> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W3125551696 abstract "Israeli courts were recently faced with the question whether an employer is allowed to voice objections to unionization during an organizing drive. Since the legislation fails to provide an answer to this question, it was up to the courts to come up with a solution. The National Labor Court in Histadrut v. Pelephone held that employers have no say and must refrain from any communications whatsoever with the workers regarding the decision whether or not to join the union. The Supreme Court later affirmed this decision. This Article explores this legal question and examines whether this decision was justified, and whether it should be adopted in other countries as well. It first discusses the justifications for the conflicting freedoms in this scenario — the workers’ freedom of association and the employer’s freedom of speech — to appreciate their relative strength in the circumstances. It then examines whether it is possible to achieve a certain balance. To this end, the Article critically reviews the legal mechanisms adopted by other legal jurisdictions (the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom) in this regard, shedding light on their effectiveness and the difficulties of organizing in practice in each jurisdiction. The main argument advanced in this Article is that the solution has to be purposive — to advance the goals of labor law, specifically freedom of association — and that the purposive analysis must be contextual. A rule prohibiting the employer from voicing opinions is surely an infringement of freedom of speech, and strong reasons are needed to justify it. Whether strong enough reasons exist depends on several contextual factors. Essentially, the question is whether it is possible, given the current context, to secure real freedom of association without such a rule. By context we mean two main things: first, the real-life current experience concerning the struggles of organizing; and second, the existence of alternative legal mechanisms that might address this problem." @default.
- W3125551696 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3125551696 creator A5042431703 @default.
- W3125551696 creator A5078324356 @default.
- W3125551696 date "2016-02-01" @default.
- W3125551696 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W3125551696 title "Organizing: Should the Employer Have a Say?" @default.
- W3125551696 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2016-0004" @default.
- W3125551696 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W3125551696 type Work @default.
- W3125551696 sameAs 3125551696 @default.
- W3125551696 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3125551696 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3125551696 hasAuthorship W3125551696A5042431703 @default.
- W3125551696 hasAuthorship W3125551696A5078324356 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C100505606 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C10144844 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C168031717 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C2776301878 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C100505606 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C10144844 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C144024400 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C15744967 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C168031717 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C169437150 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C169760540 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C17744445 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C185592680 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C190253527 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C199539241 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C2776301878 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C2776949292 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C2777351106 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C2778272461 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C55493867 @default.
- W3125551696 hasConceptScore W3125551696C98184364 @default.
- W3125551696 hasLocation W31255516961 @default.
- W3125551696 hasOpenAccess W3125551696 @default.
- W3125551696 hasPrimaryLocation W31255516961 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W1518367613 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W1542469913 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W1787130189 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W192621094 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W2214867946 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W2219906461 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W2256781249 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W3121766469 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W3122077487 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W3123575465 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W3123747942 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W3125767446 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W3177403183 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W335434581 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W35878703 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W577197919 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W74099333 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W774361766 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W1943799759 @default.
- W3125551696 hasRelatedWork W209377408 @default.
- W3125551696 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3125551696 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3125551696 magId "3125551696" @default.
- W3125551696 workType "article" @default.