Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125627017> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W3125627017 abstract "One of the most common criticisms of contemporary free speech law is that it is too Lochnerian. What critics usually mean by this is that First Amendment doctrine, by extending significant constitutional protection to advertising and other kinds of commercially-oriented speech, makes the same mistake as the Supreme Court made in Lochner v. New York, and other early late nineteenth and early twentieth century Due Process Clause cases: namely, it grants judges too much power to second-guess the economic policy decisions of democratically-elected legislatures. This Article challenges that argument — not to reject the idea that contemporary free speech law resurrects Lochner, but instead to reconceive what that means. It argues that contemporary free speech law is not Lochner-like in failing to defer to the legislature’s economic policy decisions. Instead, it repeats the errors of the Lochner Court by relying upon an almost wholly negative and anti-redistributive notion of freedom of speech. The result is a body of law that, not just in its commercial and corporate speech cases, but in many other cases as well, replicates Lochner Era due process jurisprudence in both its doctrinal structure and its political economic effects. By reconceiving the Lochner analogy, this Article illuminates fundamental problems with the contemporary First Amendment. By examining the ways in which the First Amendment once fit into the New Deal Settlement, but does so no longer, it also suggests a far more satisfying solution to the First Amendment’s Lochner problem than the conventional account allows. Rather than narrowing the scope of the First Amendment or weakening the constitutional protection afforded commercially-oriented speech, it argues that courts should embrace a more positive conception of the free speech guarantee and one that can more effectively protect expressive freedom from the threats posed to it by private as well as public power. Doing so, it acknowledges, may make what are today relatively easy free speech disputes much more difficult. But there is ultimately no other way to vindicate First Amendment values — including, the core democratic value of ensuring a diverse and inclusive public debate." @default.
- W3125627017 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3125627017 creator A5028074089 @default.
- W3125627017 date "2019-04-18" @default.
- W3125627017 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3125627017 title "The First Amendment's Real Lochner Problem" @default.
- W3125627017 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W3125627017 type Work @default.
- W3125627017 sameAs 3125627017 @default.
- W3125627017 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3125627017 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W3125627017 hasAuthorship W3125627017A5028074089 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C120432598 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C126806153 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C18650270 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C2776156098 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C521332185 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C120432598 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C126806153 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C138885662 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C144024400 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C17744445 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C18650270 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C190253527 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C199539241 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C2776156098 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C2776211767 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C2778272461 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C2994536602 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C41895202 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C521332185 @default.
- W3125627017 hasConceptScore W3125627017C71043370 @default.
- W3125627017 hasLocation W31256270171 @default.
- W3125627017 hasOpenAccess W3125627017 @default.
- W3125627017 hasPrimaryLocation W31256270171 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W1538367144 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W1555256078 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W1589496960 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W1592287912 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W1924587017 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W1937228520 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2174367942 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2289289854 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2397913413 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2470177791 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2514300741 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2928896572 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W2955085483 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W3110821269 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W3123735324 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W3125868734 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W3162745091 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W3197990410 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W3212239049 @default.
- W3125627017 hasRelatedWork W78233852 @default.
- W3125627017 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3125627017 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3125627017 magId "3125627017" @default.
- W3125627017 workType "article" @default.