Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125653888> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W3125653888 startingPage "75" @default.
- W3125653888 abstract "The perfect is the enemy of the good. Could the approach to section 9 laid out in Grant have been constructed differently? Yes. But are we, because of that decision, magnitudes of order clearer on how to approach section 9? Also yes. The Supreme Court's decision in Grant, seemingly the product of careful negotiation given the time it has taken for the judgment to be handed down in a fashion having a clear majority, has created what has for over 25 years been lacking with regard to detention. Where before we had very few decisions, those decisions not easily reconcilable with each other, and lower courts forced to create their own doctrine on unresolved issues, we now have an overarching framework which can be applied. Questions remain unresolved, but it is now clear what approach to take in resolving them. Grant is to section 9 what Hunter v. Southam is to section 8. Prior to this, there were very few clear rules around section 9. The Court had defined as a discretion with criteria, express or implied, which govern its exercise. This was not merely one way of being it was offered and applied as the meaning of arbitrariness. Although this was the definition, however, lower courts frequently had to deal with situations in which powers to detain were misused: not applied without criteria, but applied based on improper criteria. Other Supreme Court decisions suggested in passing that improperly used powers could result in an detention, though they did not reconcile this possibility with, or even mention, the definition. The difficulty here is that a stop based on something like racial profiling seems obviously to violate section 9, but it is not a detention based on no criteria — quite the opposite. Further related to the meaning of arbitrary, it was not clear what the relationship between unlawfulness and arbitrariness was. It had been decided that a lawful detention was not though exactly how that rule was to interact with the suggestion that misuse of a legal power could make a detention had not been discussed. It had not been decided — indeed, it had been deliberately left undecided — whether an unlawful detention was by nature arbitrary. Many lower courts had concluded that a detention could fail to comply with the law but still not have been arbitrary: that something more than mere unlawfulness was needed to make a detention arbitrary. If that was true, it was not clear exactly what more was needed. If that was not true, it was unclear how one would relate two different rules, which might well conflict: arbitrary equals no and arbitrary equals unlawful." @default.
- W3125653888 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3125653888 creator A5025760550 @default.
- W3125653888 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W3125653888 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W3125653888 title "Great Strides in Section 9 Jurisprudence" @default.
- W3125653888 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W3125653888 type Work @default.
- W3125653888 sameAs 3125653888 @default.
- W3125653888 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3125653888 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3125653888 hasAuthorship W3125653888A5025760550 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C2777451423 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C111472728 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C111919701 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C138885662 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C144024400 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C17744445 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C190253527 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C199539241 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C2776211767 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C2777451423 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C2777632292 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C2778272461 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C2780129039 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C2780876879 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C41008148 @default.
- W3125653888 hasConceptScore W3125653888C71043370 @default.
- W3125653888 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W3125653888 hasLocation W31256538881 @default.
- W3125653888 hasOpenAccess W3125653888 @default.
- W3125653888 hasPrimaryLocation W31256538881 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W181970050 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W182411917 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W1913287020 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W1969180512 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2001987112 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2039981008 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2127108066 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W220031618 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2242865105 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2269778463 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2286322069 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2316265919 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2317787259 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2483764726 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2529970400 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2915823883 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W2977667397 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W3123533165 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W45395194 @default.
- W3125653888 hasRelatedWork W1901849816 @default.
- W3125653888 hasVolume "66" @default.
- W3125653888 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3125653888 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3125653888 magId "3125653888" @default.
- W3125653888 workType "article" @default.