FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3125957790> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3125957790 endingPage "59" @default.
• W3125957790 startingPage "37" @default.
• W3125957790 abstract "I INTRODUCTION In this article's contribution to the symposium Theorizing Contemporary Legal Thought, I inquire into some of the topic's methodological difficulties. In particular, I suggest that, as the writing of thought is the writing of a kind of history, we ought to pay attention both to the special historiographical challenges we are likely to experience as well as those avenues that may better ease our passage into a telling of the legal Ultimately, my argument is that, although it has been in the periphery for a generation, structuralist history may be an edifying way of usefully constructing a history of thought. (1) But first things first. Perhaps you haven't heard of thought. could be because you already know it, only by another name, maybe the new private (2) or new realism. (3) Or maybe thought is a mystery due to a temptation to look for analogies in other disciplines, like history. (4) If so, the idea of art may seem of little use, however, since we typically suspect history and history to be very different things. (5) Trying a different approach, you might wonder if thought is a meaningful category at all. Might it not be the same thing as the modern thought of the first half of the twentieth century? If not, and modern and have different meanings in history, what could they be? (6) Falling further, you might even wonder whether modern has any stable meaning, much less a postmodern contemporary. Interestingly, in whichever register we ask it, the question of thought has rarely been answered. (7) One possible explanation for this lack is the balkanized state of studies in the United States, a condition in which judges, lawyers, and academics might operate in an intricately fragmented grid of expertise. (8) From this point of view, when we imagine what we envision is something like the law school faculty webpage, divided up into its disparate areas of experts. (9) There are the business law experts, the civil rights experts, the constitutional law experts, the international law experts, and so on. (10) In normal times, these departments of expertise are not understood as having much to do with one another. Moreover, the debates that go on within these areas among the experts themselves splinter the territory even further. The history of the disciplines, according to this balkanized view, is a history of shards. (11) As Christopher Tomlins has suggested, This is the scholarly world we live in now, a world of fragments that lacks a kaleidoscope, a world of noncausal relationality. (12) Although there are sure to be any number of causes for our scholarly hermitry, I suspect that this beauteous fragmentation is partially a residue of the postmodernism that arrived at American law schools in the 1980s, (13) and that it is this residue that now works as a block on our theorizing about thought. (14) That is, one possible reason for our general lack of conversation about the legal contemporary is that we have arrived at a place in which it has become increasingly difficult to have such conversations. Poststructuralist views of law have yielded an orientation toward history whereby the idea of unities and cross-cutting totalizations have become increasingly suspect, and grand narratives about evolving periods of thought have gone out of fashion. (15) But as the broad sweeps have been (appropriately) rendered problematic, historians have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, pushing the discipline to be ever more historicist, more contextual, more contingent, (16) albeit more professionally accepted. (17) To be sure, there was much wrong about the breadth of prestructuralist historiography, and it remains a curiosity how it managed for as long as it did. …" @default.
• W3125957790 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3125957790 creator A5040043215 @default.
• W3125957790 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W3125957790 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3125957790 title "Structuralist Legal Histories" @default.
• W3125957790 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W3125957790 type Work @default.
• W3125957790 sameAs 3125957790 @default.
• W3125957790 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3125957790 countsByYear W31259577902017 @default.
• W3125957790 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3125957790 hasAuthorship W3125957790A5040043215 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C2778223634 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C2779271205 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C2780573756 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C509535802 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C107038049 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C111472728 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C124952713 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C138885662 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C142362112 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C17744445 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C185592680 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C199539241 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C27206212 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C2778223634 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C2779271205 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C2780573756 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C2780876879 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C29598333 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C509535802 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C55493867 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C95457728 @default.
• W3125957790 hasConceptScore W3125957790C98184364 @default.
• W3125957790 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3125957790 hasLocation W31259577901 @default.
• W3125957790 hasOpenAccess W3125957790 @default.
• W3125957790 hasPrimaryLocation W31259577901 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W1479477343 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W165565939 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W1977756613 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2015732277 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2020478273 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2063088807 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2076074443 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2094999299 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2107356887 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2108264874 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2109736718 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2252580799 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2315539372 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2346596641 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W253550754 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W2762468692 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W3110305218 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W342271228 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W346380111 @default.
• W3125957790 hasRelatedWork W65413257 @default.
• W3125957790 hasVolume "78" @default.
• W3125957790 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3125957790 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3125957790 magId "3125957790" @default.
• W3125957790 workType "article" @default.