FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W312596271> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W312596271 endingPage "212" @default.
• W312596271 startingPage "136" @default.
• W312596271 abstract "[T]he science of jurisprudence, pride of human intellect, which with all its defects, redundancies, and errors is collected reason of ages, combining principles of original justice with infinite variety of human concerns . . . . I. Introduction: Transnational Jurisprudence and Challenge to Comparative Constitutional Theory [I]rrelevant are practices of 'world community,' whose notions of justice are (thankfully) not always those of our people.2 These words of Justice Antonin Scalia are hardly reassuring to those of us who study and write about some of these practices, believing perhaps that justice and his colleagues might benefit in some small way from what we have learned from our travels and reflection. To be sure, fact that Justice Scalia's sentiment was voiced in course of questioning appropriateness of another Justice's invocation of foreign experience suggests that there may actually be some judicial receptivity to comparative insights and findings. But that only begs question of why there should be. question came up again on last day of 2002 Supreme Court term when, in his opinion for Court striking down Texas homosexual sodomy statute, Justice Anthony Kennedy cited several decisions of European Court of Human Rights in support of majority's holding in case.3 The right petitioners seek in case has been accepted as an integral part of human freedom in many other countries.4 In response, Justice Scalia dismissed [t]he Court's discussion of these foreign views as meaningless, but [d]angerous dicta,5 repeating now familiar refrain that this Court. . . should not impose foreign moods, fads, or fashions on Americans.6 Given momentousness of legal change wrought by decision, exchange received only passing glance in extensive commentary immediately following its announcement. It has since received more attention; Robert Bork, for example, has cited to foreign sources in Lawrence v. Texas (along with Grutter v. Bollinger)7 as episodes in an absurd turn in our jurisprudence that reflects arrogance of power of modern judiciary.8 [E]ven Scalia at his gloomiest probably did not foresee [how new Constitution] might be designed bit by bit from European, Asian, and African models.9 In recent book, he connects jurisprudential turn with one of his longstanding concerns, the transnational culture war.10 Along similar lines, Ken Kersch discovered in seemingly benign references to foreign sources a vast and ongoing intellectual project, part of sophisticated effort to transform American constitutional law and its interpretation. As result, [e]ventually, and possibly sooner than we think, nature and path of American constitutional development will be radically altered.12 These reactions may very well exaggerate influence of external sources in outcomes of these cases, and arguably they overstate broader jurisprudential significance of infusion from abroad. They do, however, address an important issue concerning role of constitutional theory in comparative law. specific problem that concerns me is suggested in Justice Scalia's objection to judicial deployment of comparative examples by Court in overturning controversial ruling in Bowers v. Hardwick.13 That case withheld status of fundamental right to consensual sexual relations between homosexuals (as well as others who perform acts of sodomy in their intimate associations) on ground that behavior in question was not deeply rooted in history and tradition.14 This provoked Justice Scalia to underscore words this Nation's and to observe that Bowers majority opinion, contrary to implication in Justice Kennedy's opinion, had not relied on values we share with wider civilization.15 His own implication was that, in contrast with Lawrence, strength of Bowers was evident in local ingredients that went into its making. …" @default.
• W312596271 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W312596271 creator A5009998559 @default.
• W312596271 date "2010-10-29" @default.
• W312596271 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W312596271 title "The Permeability of Constitutional Borders" @default.
• W312596271 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf46j.7" @default.
• W312596271 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W312596271 type Work @default.
• W312596271 sameAs 312596271 @default.
• W312596271 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W312596271 countsByYear W3125962712012 @default.
• W312596271 countsByYear W3125962712014 @default.
• W312596271 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W312596271 hasAuthorship W312596271A5009998559 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C2776217807 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C47855350 @default.
• W312596271 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C139621336 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C144024400 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C169437150 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C17319257 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C17744445 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C199539241 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C2776217807 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C2778272461 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C47855350 @default.
• W312596271 hasConceptScore W312596271C71043370 @default.
• W312596271 hasLocation W3125962711 @default.
• W312596271 hasOpenAccess W312596271 @default.
• W312596271 hasPrimaryLocation W3125962711 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W1493790999 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W1495516551 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W1534225681 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W1534543927 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W20592607 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W21960099 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W2263860248 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W2281881615 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W2299570473 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W2527984406 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W25875716 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W295096621 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W311632158 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W3121728553 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W3123850471 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W3126037915 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W317023466 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W763236730 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W963615516 @default.
• W312596271 hasRelatedWork W971925570 @default.
• W312596271 isParatext "false" @default.
• W312596271 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W312596271 magId "312596271" @default.
• W312596271 workType "book-chapter" @default.