FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126028316> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3126028316 abstract "In their paper of 2011 titled Gender and Philosophical Intuition Wesley Buckwalter and Stephen Stich argue that the intuitions of women and men differ significantly on various types of philosophical questions. Furthermore, men’s intuitions, so the authors, are more in line with traditionally accepted solutions of classical problems. This inherent bias, so the argument, is one of the factors that leads more men than women to pursue degrees and careers in philosophy. We attempted to replicate three of the classes of questions that Buckwalter and Stich review in their paper and for which they report significant differences. We failed to replicate the results. In specific we attempted replication of Section 3.2 and 3.8 in Buckwalter and Stich (2011). Additionally, in Section 3.1 of their paper Buckwalter and Stich report differences for a Gettier type thought experiment. We had collected data on four Gettier style scenarios and analyzed these for differences between women and men. Here, again, we could not detect a difference. Given our results, we do not believe that the outcomes of Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.8 reported in Buckwalter and Stich (2011) are robust and more data is needed to make stronger claims on a gender difference on these classes of scenarios. In addition to the strict replication, we also wanted to test the scenarios on a different sample of participants. For their data Buckwalter and Stich only include individuals who had not taken any philosophy courses. The reason for this selection is that Buckwalter and Stich wanted to examine individuals who had not been biased by previous study of the cases. However, this way Buckwalter and Stich tested samples of individuals who either never had an interest or possibility to pursue philosophy as a career. Given the discussion of their paper about who enters academic philosophy, this sample is not quite adequate. Hence, we collected data on how many philosophy courses participants had taken and whether they had seen the scenarios before. This way we could analyze individuals who were interested enough to at least have taken some philosophy courses but who had not been biased by direct exposure of the scenarios. For this sample, again, there was no significant difference between men and women." @default.
• W3126028316 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3126028316 creator A5008440672 @default.
• W3126028316 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W3126028316 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3126028316 title "On Gender and Philosophical Intuition: Failure of Replication and Other Negative Results" @default.
• W3126028316 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2166447" @default.
• W3126028316 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W3126028316 type Work @default.
• W3126028316 sameAs 3126028316 @default.
• W3126028316 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3126028316 countsByYear W31260283162014 @default.
• W3126028316 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3126028316 hasAuthorship W3126028316A5008440672 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C12590798 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C132010649 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C2781162219 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C105795698 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C111472728 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C12590798 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C126322002 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C132010649 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C138885662 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C15744967 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C159047783 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C2781162219 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C33923547 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C71924100 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C77805123 @default.
• W3126028316 hasConceptScore W3126028316C98184364 @default.
• W3126028316 hasLocation W31260283161 @default.
• W3126028316 hasOpenAccess W3126028316 @default.
• W3126028316 hasPrimaryLocation W31260283161 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W1978166354 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2011055160 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2043182701 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2062513331 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2066890529 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2070658931 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2163004270 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2181266875 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2220092201 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2245214564 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2289663967 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2339464127 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2503157605 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2507858125 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2531490565 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2898980318 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2946086182 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W3157824511 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W3184378113 @default.
• W3126028316 hasRelatedWork W2337506588 @default.
• W3126028316 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3126028316 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3126028316 magId "3126028316" @default.
• W3126028316 workType "article" @default.