FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126040329> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3126040329 endingPage "220" @default.
• W3126040329 startingPage "196" @default.
• W3126040329 abstract "One of the underappreciated developments in international trade law is the degree to which the WTO Appellate Body is failing to abide by negotiated procedural norms in reviewing Member State action. This essay highlights systemic problems with Appellate Body decision-making as reflected in the controversial case of US-Zeroing. The problems reflected in US—Zeroing go to central issues of judicial restraint, including concerns regarding the standard of review, appellate fact-finding, and justiciable notions of ripeness. This essay concludes that the Appellate Body in US-Zeroing circumvented the particularized standard of review required under the WTO Agreement, took upon itself the unacceptable task of appellate fact-finding, and inappropriately expanded the authority to hear facial challenges of discretionary agency action. In short, the US-Zeroing decision belies the felicitous notion that WTO dispute resolution embraces an approach of judicial restraint. The WTO Agreements require the Appellate Body to defer to reasonable Member State interpretations of WTO treaty obligations in a manner analogous to Chevron deference. As US-Zeroing underscores, the Appellate Body in fact has eschewed anything approaching Chevron deference. The essay suggests that the Appellate Body is overreaching in not adhering to its obligations to defer. The essay also highlights the problem of Appellate Body fact-finding in US-Zeroing. The essay argues that the case is troubling because the WTO agreements require WTO panels to defer to the objective and unbiased factual findings of Member State authorities, and doubly troubling because the Appellate Body's assessment of the facts under the DSU requires deference to the factual findings of the WTO panels. As such, the WTO agreements require double deference to factual findings below. But the Appellate Body in US-Zeroing displayed no such deference. Finally, the essay focuses on the movement away from the mandatory/discretionary doctrine. That doctrine was the essential limitation on facial challenges to Member State action that did not rise to the level of mandatory obligations. As a consequence of the Appellate Body's interpretation in US-Zeroing, facial challenges once reserved for provisions of binding legislation are now available for virtually any general and prospective agency action. Quite literally, the Appellate Body's decision in US-Zeroing suggests that review of discretionary agency action will be more robust and searching when undertaken by an exacting international body in Geneva than by a deferential federal court in New York." @default.
• W3126040329 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3126040329 creator A5046583037 @default.
• W3126040329 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W3126040329 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W3126040329 title "Reflections on US—Zeroing: A Study in Judicial Overreaching by the WTO Appellate Body" @default.
• W3126040329 cites W2257903395 @default.
• W3126040329 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W3126040329 type Work @default.
• W3126040329 sameAs 3126040329 @default.
• W3126040329 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3126040329 countsByYear W31260403292014 @default.
• W3126040329 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3126040329 hasAuthorship W3126040329A5046583037 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2777861868 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2780661485 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2781442640 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C3019422483 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C108170787 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C11413529 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C121332964 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C144024400 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C155202549 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C162324750 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C17744445 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C185436325 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C190253527 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C199539241 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2777861868 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2779010840 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2780597233 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2780661485 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2780791683 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2781442640 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C2910001868 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C3019422483 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C36289849 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C41008148 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C48103436 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C48764862 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C55447825 @default.
• W3126040329 hasConceptScore W3126040329C62520636 @default.
• W3126040329 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3126040329 hasLocation W31260403291 @default.
• W3126040329 hasOpenAccess W3126040329 @default.
• W3126040329 hasPrimaryLocation W31260403291 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W145821768 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W1560671877 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2027061630 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2164838594 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2211811305 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2228931735 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2273531135 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2335840406 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2416715705 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2499032865 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2899620700 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2964189393 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2984672542 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W2992219980 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W3030562021 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W3121835975 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W3122775866 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W3124434549 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W3126842054 @default.
• W3126040329 hasRelatedWork W3136178797 @default.
• W3126040329 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W3126040329 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3126040329 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3126040329 magId "3126040329" @default.
• W3126040329 workType "article" @default.