FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126196697> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3126196697 endingPage "e10631" @default.
• W3126196697 startingPage "e10631" @default.
• W3126196697 abstract "There is a multitude of protocols of treatment of cleft lip and palate (CLP) worldwide differing in number of operations, surgical techniques, and timings of surgeries. Despite, facial appearance in subjects with CLP is rarely ideal and residual stigmata are easy to notice in many patients irrespective of the protocol. The prospective controlled investigations are optimal for comparing effectiveness of treatment protocols. Because prospective studies are very challenging to perform in CLP field, it is reasonable to retrospectively assess different surgical protocols to identify the promising ones and then to test them in a prospective way.Our objective was to assess the nasolabial appearance in a preadolescent Slavic population with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) by using the 0-200 numeric scale with reference photographs. Patients treated in Warsaw, Poland (n = 32), Prague, Czech Republic (n = 26) and Bratislava, Slovakia (n = 17) were included in this retrospective study. Each cleft center used a unique surgical protocol. Two panels of professional raters (n = 7) and laypeople (n = 10) scored blindly the nasolabial esthetics on cropped frontal and profile images with cropped reference photograph present on the same slide. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, t-tests, and Bland-Altman plots. Inter-group differences were evaluated with one-way ANOVA and regression analysis.The agreement within and between raters was acceptable. We found that patients treated in Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava showed comparable nasolabial appearance on frontal and profile photographs when judged by both professional raters (p > 0.05) and laypeople (p > 0.05). Regression analysis did not identify influence of gender, group (i.e., Warsaw, Prague, and Bratislava), age at lip repair, surgeon, and age at photographic assessment on esthetic outcome (p > 0.05).This study showed that none of the surgical protocols showed superiority to produce good nasolabial appearance." @default.
• W3126196697 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5009930460 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5018328159 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5018692732 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5038229814 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5053929200 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5062150731 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5069539026 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5077061760 @default.
• W3126196697 creator A5085520151 @default.
• W3126196697 date "2021-02-09" @default.
• W3126196697 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3126196697 title "The Slavcleft: a three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance" @default.
• W3126196697 cites W1875635978 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W1972301572 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W1982716294 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2020348719 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2072081309 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2082396044 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2105151867 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2116884174 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2126175194 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2130902251 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2136672770 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2139943228 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2152455245 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2162798167 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2163261016 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2165808070 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2424639490 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2429240927 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2584470664 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W2923096747 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W3038030412 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W4243963098 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W4251670210 @default.
• W3126196697 cites W63962891 @default.
• W3126196697 doi "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10631" @default.
• W3126196697 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7879938" @default.
• W3126196697 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33614265" @default.
• W3126196697 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3126196697 type Work @default.
• W3126196697 sameAs 3126196697 @default.
• W3126196697 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3126196697 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5009930460 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5018328159 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5018692732 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5038229814 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5053929200 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5062150731 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5069539026 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5077061760 @default.
• W3126196697 hasAuthorship W3126196697A5085520151 @default.
• W3126196697 hasBestOaLocation W31261966971 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C2775935860 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C2778311950 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C104709138 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C106906290 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C141071460 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C171606756 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C188816634 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C199343813 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C2775935860 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C2778311950 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C2908647359 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C29694066 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C70410870 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C71924100 @default.
• W3126196697 hasConceptScore W3126196697C99454951 @default.
• W3126196697 hasLocation W31261966971 @default.
• W3126196697 hasLocation W31261966972 @default.
• W3126196697 hasLocation W31261966973 @default.
• W3126196697 hasLocation W31261966974 @default.
• W3126196697 hasLocation W31261966975 @default.
• W3126196697 hasOpenAccess W3126196697 @default.
• W3126196697 hasPrimaryLocation W31261966971 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W1982402759 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W2018953058 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W2468706459 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W2803863832 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W2807124126 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W2953079817 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W3126196697 @default.
• W3126196697 hasRelatedWork W4220884274 @default.

• next