FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126202224> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3126202224 endingPage "129" @default.
• W3126202224 startingPage "109" @default.
• W3126202224 abstract "Objective: Publishing in highly ranked disciplinary journals plays a critical role in career advancement. Yet, the process through which journals are classified as top-tier is largely unexamined in the social work literature. To better understand the utility of various methods for determining journal quality, we compare three basic approaches to ranking disciplinary journals: reputation, h-index values, and impact factors (IFs). More specifically, we compare faculty perceptions of social work journals in 2019 with faculty perceptions in 2000, Google Scholar h-index rankings from 2010, and Clarivate Analytics’ IFs from 2008 and 2017. Method: To create a current, reputation-based ranking of disciplinarily periodicals, a national sample of tenure-track faculty (N = 307) evaluated the overall quality and prestige of social work periodicals (N = 64). We obtained prior faculty perceptions of quality and prestige from Sellers et al. (2004), h-index values from Hodge and Lacasse (2011), and 2008 and 2017 IFs from Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science portal. Results: Faculty perceptions of quality exhibited a relatively strong correlation with faculty perceptions in 2000 (rs = .76), suggesting that faculty perceptions regarding journal quality are relatively stable across decades. Among the citation-based approaches, the 2010 Google Scholar h-index values exhibited the strongest correlation with current faculty perceptions (rs = .81), and the 2017 IFs had the lowest correlation (rs = .48). Conclusions: The results provide some guidance to disciplinary stakeholders making assessments about top-tier journals. For instance, the relative stability of faculty perceptions enables scholars to have some confidence that journals that are currently perceived as top-tier will remain so in the future. Results also raise questions about the utility of relying upon IFs in assessments of journal quality." @default.
• W3126202224 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3126202224 creator A5001467692 @default.
• W3126202224 creator A5027864179 @default.
• W3126202224 creator A5028735533 @default.
• W3126202224 date "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3126202224 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3126202224 title "Ranking Disciplinary Social Work Journals: Comparing Faculty Perceptions With Two Citation-Based Approaches" @default.
• W3126202224 cites W1517087616 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W1521828747 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W1532569518 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W1534232609 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W1585284133 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W1950351096 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2009267474 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2022145714 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2025758077 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2041315139 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2047507521 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2070548868 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2084789242 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2109460006 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2133504507 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2152502314 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2164444006 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2178471959 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2322864521 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2343420296 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2382051335 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2599057150 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2801216920 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2810514338 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2888182029 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2895831373 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2911786467 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2917185528 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W2929237259 @default.
• W3126202224 cites W3102325394 @default.
• W3126202224 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/713306" @default.
• W3126202224 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3126202224 type Work @default.
• W3126202224 sameAs 3126202224 @default.
• W3126202224 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3126202224 countsByYear W31262022242021 @default.
• W3126202224 countsByYear W31262022242022 @default.
• W3126202224 countsByYear W31262022242023 @default.
• W3126202224 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3126202224 hasAuthorship W3126202224A5001467692 @default.
• W3126202224 hasAuthorship W3126202224A5027864179 @default.
• W3126202224 hasAuthorship W3126202224A5028735533 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C178315738 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C2778032371 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C2778329345 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C79158427 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConcept C8795937 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C111472728 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C136764020 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C138885662 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C144024400 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C151719136 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C15744967 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C161191863 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C169760540 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C17744445 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C178315738 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C189430467 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C199539241 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C23123220 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C2522767166 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C26760741 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C2777382242 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C2778032371 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C2778329345 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C2778805511 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C2779530757 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C36289849 @default.
• W3126202224 hasConceptScore W3126202224C41008148 @default.

• next