FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126202455> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3126202455 endingPage "343" @default.
• W3126202455 startingPage "333" @default.
• W3126202455 abstract "Background and Aims Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is particularly challenging and limited to a few expert centers. We recently conducted a pilot study on improvement of colonic ESD with systematic use of a countertraction device (double-clip traction with rubber band [DCT-ESD]). Methods A French prospective multicenter study was conducted between March 2017 and September 2019, including all consecutive cases of naive colonic ESD. Since the first case of DCT-ESD in March 2017, all cases of colonic ESD have been performed using the DCT-ESD strategy in the 3 centers involved in the study. Results Five hundred ninety-nine lesions with a mean size of 53 mm were included in this study, resected by 5 operators in 3 centers. The en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 95.7%, 83.5%, and 81.1%, respectively. The adverse event rates were 4.9% for perforation and 4.2% for postprocedure bleeding. Between 2017 and 2019, the rates of R0 and curative resections increased significantly from 74.7% in 2017 to 88.4% in 2019 (P = .003) and from 72.6% in 2017 to 86.3% in 2019 (P = .004), respectively. Procedure duration and speed of resection were 62.4 minutes and 39.4 mm2/minute, respectively. No differences were noted between operators. Conclusion DCT-ESD is a safe and reproducible technique, with results comparable with those of the large Japanese teams with speed of resection twice as high as previously reported studies. The DCT strategy is promising, cheap, and seems to be reproducible. Physicians performing colonic ESD should be aware of this promising tool to improve their results in ESD. Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is particularly challenging and limited to a few expert centers. We recently conducted a pilot study on improvement of colonic ESD with systematic use of a countertraction device (double-clip traction with rubber band [DCT-ESD]). A French prospective multicenter study was conducted between March 2017 and September 2019, including all consecutive cases of naive colonic ESD. Since the first case of DCT-ESD in March 2017, all cases of colonic ESD have been performed using the DCT-ESD strategy in the 3 centers involved in the study. Five hundred ninety-nine lesions with a mean size of 53 mm were included in this study, resected by 5 operators in 3 centers. The en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 95.7%, 83.5%, and 81.1%, respectively. The adverse event rates were 4.9% for perforation and 4.2% for postprocedure bleeding. Between 2017 and 2019, the rates of R0 and curative resections increased significantly from 74.7% in 2017 to 88.4% in 2019 (P = .003) and from 72.6% in 2017 to 86.3% in 2019 (P = .004), respectively. Procedure duration and speed of resection were 62.4 minutes and 39.4 mm2/minute, respectively. No differences were noted between operators. DCT-ESD is a safe and reproducible technique, with results comparable with those of the large Japanese teams with speed of resection twice as high as previously reported studies. The DCT strategy is promising, cheap, and seems to be reproducible. Physicians performing colonic ESD should be aware of this promising tool to improve their results in ESD." @default.
• W3126202455 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5000446498 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5013335543 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5025496208 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5031257359 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5032339171 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5032891791 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5034215871 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5045898590 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5050734380 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5055360615 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5060417563 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5069027393 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5080092648 @default.
• W3126202455 creator A5081817676 @default.
• W3126202455 date "2021-08-01" @default.
• W3126202455 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3126202455 title "Double-clip traction for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study of 599 consecutive cases (with video)" @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2014832109 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2015044811 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2016202648 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2017821327 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2054270292 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2077147525 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2078905379 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2091505790 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2093712322 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2117183420 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2162986718 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2194475800 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2288698772 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2318846370 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2415243411 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2416562912 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2422548507 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2568940069 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2588262134 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2594687441 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2626352834 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2752878317 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2755518939 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2761542601 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2788784312 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2793137584 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2807820203 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2811510173 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2890153430 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2898641772 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2913043411 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2945450425 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2948427297 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2949063079 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2955827439 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2962883110 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2970171007 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2970486888 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2972018115 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W2980511550 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W3001025082 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W3005127620 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W3011614760 @default.
• W3126202455 cites W3016912349 @default.
• W3126202455 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.036" @default.
• W3126202455 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33548280" @default.
• W3126202455 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3126202455 type Work @default.
• W3126202455 sameAs 3126202455 @default.
• W3126202455 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W3126202455 countsByYear W31262024552021 @default.
• W3126202455 countsByYear W31262024552022 @default.
• W3126202455 countsByYear W31262024552023 @default.
• W3126202455 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5000446498 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5013335543 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5025496208 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5031257359 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5032339171 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5032891791 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5034215871 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5045898590 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5050734380 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5055360615 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5060417563 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5069027393 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5080092648 @default.
• W3126202455 hasAuthorship W3126202455A5081817676 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C2992435398 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3126202455 hasConceptScore W3126202455C141071460 @default.

• next