FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126253082> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3126253082 endingPage "367" @default.
• W3126253082 startingPage "353" @default.
• W3126253082 abstract "In this article, the authors propose an algorithm for the evaluation of patients with orofacial nerve injury. The algorithm is specifically designed to grade the extent of impairment in sensory capacity and its behavioral impact (for the patient with decreased sensation) and the “complexity” of the pathophysiologic mechanism underlying the pain (for the patient with unpleasant sensation and/or pain). The rationale for this approach is based on limited clinical data that suggest the following. First, different criteria are most appropriately employed to judge whether patients with decreased sensation and with dysesthesia/pain are candidates for definitive surgical treatments.12- 21- 48- 49 Second, patients with decreased sensation appear to benefit from these surgical treatments in proportion to their preoperative impairment in sensory capacity and perceived functional deficits.12,48,49,50 Specifically, factors that support a clinical decision for surgical treatment and are assessed by the algorithm include (1) a patient report of altered sensation that is “bothersome” and affects daily function or behavior,21 (2) physical evidence of self-induced trauma or injury, (3) moderate or severe impairment in sensory capacity,48 and (4) complete anesthesia.12,21,48 In contrast, factors that do not favor the surgical option include (1) a patient report of altered sensation that is rarely noticed and does not affect daily function or behavior, (2) no or little physical evidence of self-induced trauma or injury, and (3) only mild impairment or normal sensory capacity.12,48 Third, patients with dysesthesia/pain fail to benefit from surgical treatments in proportion to the extent that their pain reflects multiple pathologic CNS and autonomic changes.13,29,49 For example, the dysesthetic patient with peripherally mediated allodynia or hyperalgesia has a good prognosis for pain relief, whereas a patient with anesthesia dolorosa is highly unlikely to benefit from nerve exploration/ repair microsurgery. Patients whose primary complaint is pain rather than “numbness” represent a major challenge to the profession because their sensory disorders may be debilitating and re- fractory to surgical treatments. Gregg recently reported that of 84 patients exhibiting chronic posttraumatic orofacial pain, only the hyperalgesic and hyperpathic components of their discomfort were notably reduced by microsurgical treatments.13 Pain was not significantly reduced in patients whose sensory disorders were diagnosed as anesthesia dolorosa or SMP. It was proposed that anesthesia dolorosa and SMP, in contrast to hyperalgesia and hyperpathia, were maintained by complex central and autonomic pathologic mechanisms. In agreement with Gregg's findings, other clinical investigators have expressed little optimism for the surgical alleviation of pain when there is evidence for “central maintenance” of the pain complaint.29- 49 Such patients can often be identified by their report of constant pain and the lack of pain relief from local anesthetic blocks proximal to the site of injury.29 Unfortunately, these very same patients often fail to benefit from alternative pharmacologic, physical, and psychological therapies. Accordingly, it has been suggested that the best treatment for the more complex dysesthesias is one of prevention: Any patient who has spontaneous or stimulus-induced pain during a consecutive 3- to 4-week period or “bothersome” paresthesia(s) and areas of total anesthesia 6 months after injury should be evaluated for microsurgery.13,29 The rationale for this recommendation is that the development of pathologic changes within the CNS, which are associated with pain and are refractory to treatment, can be aborted by early surgical intervention. However, there is little scientific evidence to support this position.49 Finally, the authors recognize that the proposed algorithm does not apply to all patients. It does, however, represent an important first step in defining a systematic approach by which high-quality care can be provided to most patients who have experienced orofacial nerve injury and in establishing a hypothetical approach for the purpose of refinement by additional clinical data. Given the growing number of nerve-injured patients presenting to the clinic for evaluation and treatment, the current need for both is unquestionable." @default.
• W3126253082 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3126253082 creator A5022128160 @default.
• W3126253082 creator A5039693326 @default.
• W3126253082 date "1992-05-01" @default.
• W3126253082 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3126253082 title "A Contemporary Approach to the Clinical Evaluation of Trigeminal Nerve Injuries" @default.
• W3126253082 cites W1981805354 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W1984556852 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W1984608410 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W1986595350 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W1989305489 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2000691636 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2004581822 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2015630446 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2021021637 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2024583834 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2024736216 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2042798086 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2051313428 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2057017956 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2057799175 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2068350548 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2068860361 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2078595856 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2080344708 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2081533056 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2088143334 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2092438254 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2103255348 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2110939862 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2132518685 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2142876677 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2152758580 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2162471211 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W2592847744 @default.
• W3126253082 cites W304528055 @default.
• W3126253082 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1042-3699(20)30593-8" @default.
• W3126253082 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W3126253082 type Work @default.
• W3126253082 sameAs 3126253082 @default.
• W3126253082 citedByCount "104" @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822012 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822013 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822014 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822015 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822016 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822017 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822018 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822019 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822020 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822021 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822022 @default.
• W3126253082 countsByYear W31262530822023 @default.
• W3126253082 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3126253082 hasAuthorship W3126253082A5022128160 @default.
• W3126253082 hasAuthorship W3126253082A5039693326 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C110235638 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C130093455 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C2775991916 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C2776016996 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C2910795874 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C94487597 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C110235638 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C130093455 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C141071460 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C15744967 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C169760540 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C1862650 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C188147891 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C2775991916 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C2776016996 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C2910795874 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C42219234 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C71924100 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C94487597 @default.
• W3126253082 hasConceptScore W3126253082C99508421 @default.
• W3126253082 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3126253082 hasLocation W31262530821 @default.
• W3126253082 hasOpenAccess W3126253082 @default.
• W3126253082 hasPrimaryLocation W31262530821 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W1996673181 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W2006802558 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W200777756 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W2017937708 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W2163983470 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W2372433102 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W2404731153 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W2566558991 @default.
• W3126253082 hasRelatedWork W4210984226 @default.

• next