Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3126996578> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3126996578 endingPage "1227" @default.
- W3126996578 startingPage "1218" @default.
- W3126996578 abstract "Currently, bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) are independently programmed in clinics using frequency allocations based on the relative location of a given electrode from the end of each electrode array. By pairing electrodes based on this method, bilateral CI recipients may have decreased sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITD) and/or interaural level differences (ILD), two cues critical for binaural tasks. There are multiple different binaural measures that can potentially be used to determine the optimal way to pair electrodes across the ears. Previous studies suggest that the optimal electrode pairing between the left and right ears may vary depending on the binaural task used. These studies, however, have only used one reference location or a single bilateral CI user. In both instances, it is difficult to determine if the results that were obtained reflect a measurement error or a systematic difference across binaural tasks. It is also difficult to determine from these studies if the differences between the three cues vary across electrode regions, which could result from differences in the availability of binaural cues across frequency regions. The purpose of this study was to determine if, after experience-dependent adaptation, there are systematic differences in the optimal pairing of electrodes at different points along the array for the optimal perception of ITD, ILD, and pitch.Data from seven bilateral Nucleus users was collected and analyzed. Participants were tested with ITD, ILD, and pitch-matching tasks using five different reference electrodes in one ear, spaced across the array. Comparisons were conducted to determine if the optimal bilateral electrode pairs systematically differed in different regions depending on whether they were measured based on ITD sensitivity, ILD sensitivity, or pitch matching, and how those pairs differed from the pairing in the participants' clinical programs.Results indicate that there was a significant difference in the optimal pairing depending on the cue measured, but only at the basal end of the array.The results suggest that optimal electrode pairings differ depending on the cue measured to determine optimal pairing, at least for the basal end of the array. This also suggests that the improvements seen when using optimally paired electrodes may be tied to the particular percept being measured both to determine electrode pairing and to assess performance, at least for the basal end of the array." @default.
- W3126996578 created "2021-02-15" @default.
- W3126996578 creator A5018445334 @default.
- W3126996578 creator A5067843692 @default.
- W3126996578 date "2021-02-02" @default.
- W3126996578 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W3126996578 title "Comparing Methods for Pairing Electrodes Across Ears With Cochlear Implants" @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1968435976 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1972952383 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1974153473 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1976413702 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1979097215 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1985029311 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1994254306 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W1995429831 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2000961698 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2002830168 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2017430026 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2018541726 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2024140090 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2027339347 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2043086475 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2043303163 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2045558177 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2046997446 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2054264388 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2063910678 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2079154323 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2083557216 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2084469777 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2095815680 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2099423530 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2105340669 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2136882896 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2139190150 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2148329528 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2288738428 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2326136506 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2395477676 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2410673805 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2587886127 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2749196801 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2790550784 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2964598682 @default.
- W3126996578 cites W2971152658 @default.
- W3126996578 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001006" @default.
- W3126996578 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33538427" @default.
- W3126996578 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3126996578 type Work @default.
- W3126996578 sameAs 3126996578 @default.
- W3126996578 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W3126996578 countsByYear W31269965782021 @default.
- W3126996578 countsByYear W31269965782022 @default.
- W3126996578 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3126996578 hasAuthorship W3126996578A5018445334 @default.
- W3126996578 hasAuthorship W3126996578A5067843692 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C103364767 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C14103023 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C17525397 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C201247586 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C2778882171 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C54101563 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C68236139 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C97562148 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C99209842 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConcept C9940772 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C103364767 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C105795698 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C121332964 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C14103023 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C15744967 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C165064840 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C169760540 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C17525397 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C201247586 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C24890656 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C26760741 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C2778882171 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C28490314 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C33923547 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C41008148 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C54101563 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C548259974 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C62520636 @default.
- W3126996578 hasConceptScore W3126996578C68236139 @default.