FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3127556321> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3127556321 endingPage "1555" @default.
• W3127556321 startingPage "1541" @default.
• W3127556321 abstract "Purpose The authors explore the market agora and the shaping of markets as controversies over the meaning and practices related to sustainability evolved. This study aims to explore what happened in a market-oriented policy regime, which aimed to address sustainability in farming and food, to assess the impact of the policy on the vegetable sector in England and to consider whether the market-oriented policy regime created a more sustainable food system for Britain. Design/methodology/approach The authors examined policy documents – agenda setting reports, policy frameworks and operational plans – and conducted interviews with experts – including policymakers, agronomists and the growers themselves, from across this heterogeneous production sector. Findings The authors found that while controversy over the meaning of sustainability impacted on the evolution of food policy and grower business practices, market conceptualisations remained in a doxic mode – naturalised and beyond dispute throughout the market agora. Research limitations/implications This is a study of a single sub-sector of the fruit and vegetable sector in a single European country and over a particular period of time. It presents a detailed, authentic representation of that sub-sector in context and diverse information sources were used to gain a variety of perspectives. However, it is acknowledged that this is a limited, qualitative study involving relatively few key informant interviews. Social implications The authors’ explanation suggests that market doxa limited how policymakers and market agora understood the economic challenges and the solutions that could be deployed for English vegetable growers, a sector so pivotal for sustainability. The authors propose that ideas from industrial marketing can be used to reignite controversy, challenge market doxa, and in doing so create space for progress in creating sustainable markets. Originality/value The authors deploy an approach advocated by Blanchet and Depeyre (2016) and use controversy to explore the evolution of policy for sustainability and market shaping in the English vegetable sector agora. In doing so the authors create a novel explanation of why policy, which aimed to usher in a sustainable market, fell short of its aims and contribute to an under-researched area examining policy for sustainability in a B2B context." @default.
• W3127556321 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3127556321 creator A5081242934 @default.
• W3127556321 creator A5081593196 @default.
• W3127556321 date "2021-01-29" @default.
• W3127556321 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3127556321 title "Controversy and doxa: sustainable food policy and the English vegetable sector?" @default.
• W3127556321 cites W103015458 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1216027732 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1548565091 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1800604109 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1843190354 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1966871598 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1970090566 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1971003159 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1982185096 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1986836980 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W1992390340 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2010053310 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2022560419 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2062674272 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2076004584 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2087268365 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2092788102 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2114946799 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2134317867 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2139599822 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2151922493 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2155915596 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2419082458 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2479738061 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2577430939 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2748908089 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2767028256 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2785154600 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2801151858 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2807331391 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2892278133 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2900213897 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2907202387 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2966001553 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W2982616997 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W3034061369 @default.
• W3127556321 cites W563144891 @default.
• W3127556321 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-01-2020-0053" @default.
• W3127556321 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3127556321 type Work @default.
• W3127556321 sameAs 3127556321 @default.
• W3127556321 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3127556321 countsByYear W31275563212022 @default.
• W3127556321 countsByYear W31275563212023 @default.
• W3127556321 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3127556321 hasAuthorship W3127556321A5081242934 @default.
• W3127556321 hasAuthorship W3127556321A5081593196 @default.
• W3127556321 hasBestOaLocation W31275563212 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C2779363069 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C549605437 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C118518473 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C144133560 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C162853370 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C166957645 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C18903297 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C205649164 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C2779343474 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C2779363069 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C549605437 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C66204764 @default.
• W3127556321 hasConceptScore W3127556321C86803240 @default.
• W3127556321 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W3127556321 hasLocation W31275563211 @default.
• W3127556321 hasLocation W31275563212 @default.
• W3127556321 hasOpenAccess W3127556321 @default.
• W3127556321 hasPrimaryLocation W31275563211 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W1485276696 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W1951398110 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W2000526052 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W2359848768 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W2361267037 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W2998202088 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W3035739100 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W4225281583 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W4313160450 @default.
• W3127556321 hasRelatedWork W4383068824 @default.
• W3127556321 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W3127556321 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3127556321 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3127556321 magId "3127556321" @default.
• W3127556321 workType "article" @default.