FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3127732266> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3127732266 endingPage "374" @default.
• W3127732266 startingPage "355" @default.
• W3127732266 abstract "Purpose This study aims to investigate the influencers’ credibility dimensions (i.e. attractiveness, trustworthiness, expertise) on purchase intention (PI) through the mediating role of cognitive and affective online engagement among the aesthetic dermatology consumers in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach The population of this study entails all followers of aesthetic dermatology clinics on their Instagram accounts. However, only three influencers from the aesthetic dermatology industry were selected and approved the request of sharing the survey instrument on their official platforms. Overall, 600 surveys were distributed, but only 384 were completed fully, constituting a 64% response rate. Findings The data analysis revealed an excellent fit for the data and indicated an impact of attractiveness and expertise on online engagement and PI. Moreover, a mediating influence was also found for online engagement on the path between influencer credibility and PI. Research limitations/implications This study has a limitation of collecting the data from only three influencers; consequently, collecting data from the followers of more than four influencers would get more generalizable results. Second, considering further, examining the mediating role of other variables such as electronic word-of-mouth (EWOM) and loyalty programs could also provide further insights onto the nature of the factors affecting the PI. In addition, future studies should examine the differences of using more than one social media platform. Practical implications The main findings of this study have a number of managerial implications for marketing management that hint at liking the influencers who are highly trusted owing to their extensive expertise in the area they are marketing rather than only depending on their physical attractiveness. The Jordanian culture does not focus only on the image shared by the social media as the reviews can either support or decline the influence of even the celebrity. Significantly, a set of managerial implications come from the current research. Social implications Two major areas are the most important; these are the trustworthy issue and the EWOM. The marketers should encourage their customers to openly talk about their experiences as they have an imperative role in liking influencers in a way that improves their PI. The second implication is related to social media platforms management that marketing managers should resolve any negative EWOM caused and to enhance followers’ satisfaction levels of the services. The increase in satisfaction positively affects PI, and the service makes the influencer role become more effective. Originality/value This study was able to add a value to the current understanding of the main antecedents of customer engagement by looking at these dimensions of perceived credibility. Another contribution was captured in this study by successfully validating the meditating impact of customer engagement between influencers’ credibility dimensions and PI, especially in the absence of the studies that have addressed such relationship." @default.
• W3127732266 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3127732266 creator A5017453435 @default.
• W3127732266 creator A5019829523 @default.
• W3127732266 creator A5027751989 @default.
• W3127732266 creator A5047566032 @default.
• W3127732266 creator A5052418412 @default.
• W3127732266 creator A5078976870 @default.
• W3127732266 date "2021-02-04" @default.
• W3127732266 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3127732266 title "Examining the impact of influencers’ credibility dimensions: attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise on the purchase intention in the aesthetic dermatology industry" @default.
• W3127732266 cites W1587265432 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W1992026348 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2023071763 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2047390227 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2061289966 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2061644131 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2062350780 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2084399600 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2086157089 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2100489781 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2106096361 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2150605459 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2153860701 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2163822384 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2169570446 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2266365163 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2398185720 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2460896747 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2510460408 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2524727912 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2593360310 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2614741404 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2758479862 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2766872368 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2770599068 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2772076243 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2793383010 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2803283208 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2809196344 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2809468846 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2899351518 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2900946251 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2909941303 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2920850257 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2924456598 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2950306762 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W2954982670 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W3121324611 @default.
• W3127732266 cites W4235678817 @default.
• W3127732266 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-07-2020-0089" @default.
• W3127732266 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3127732266 type Work @default.
• W3127732266 sameAs 3127732266 @default.
• W3127732266 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W3127732266 countsByYear W31277322662021 @default.
• W3127732266 countsByYear W31277322662022 @default.
• W3127732266 countsByYear W31277322662023 @default.
• W3127732266 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3127732266 hasAuthorship W3127732266A5017453435 @default.
• W3127732266 hasAuthorship W3127732266A5019829523 @default.
• W3127732266 hasAuthorship W3127732266A5027751989 @default.
• W3127732266 hasAuthorship W3127732266A5047566032 @default.
• W3127732266 hasAuthorship W3127732266A5052418412 @default.
• W3127732266 hasAuthorship W3127732266A5078976870 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C192975520 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C26011011 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C2776967331 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C54649085 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C11171543 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C112698675 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C136764020 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C144133560 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C15744967 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C162853370 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C17744445 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C192975520 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C199539241 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C26011011 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C2776967331 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C2780224610 @default.
• W3127732266 hasConceptScore W3127732266C2908647359 @default.

• next