FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3127902494> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3127902494 abstract "Abstract Objective Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been applied in the clinic for decades; nevertheless, which surgical approach has a lower rate of postoperative complications is still inconclusive. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the postoperative complications within 30 days between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery based on randomized controlled trials. Methods Randomized controlled trials (until May 2020) that compared robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were searched through PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc). Data regarding sample size, clinical and demographic characteristics, and postoperative complications within 30 days, including overall postoperative complications, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ III), anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, bleeding, ileus, urinary complications, respiratory complications, conversion to open surgery, unscheduled reoperation, perioperative mortality, and pathological outcomes, were extracted. The results were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. Results Seven randomized controlled trials that included 507 robotic and 516 laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery cases were included. Meta-analysis showed that the overall postoperative complications within 30 days [ Z = 1.1, OR = 1.18, 95% CI (0.88–1.57), P = 0.27], severe postoperative complications [ Z = 0.22, OR = 1.12, 95% CI (0.41–3.07), P = 0.83], anastomotic leakage [Z = 0.96, OR = 1.27, 95% CI (0.78–2.08), P = 0.34], surgical site infection [ Z = 0.18, OR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.61–1.79), P = 0.86], bleeding [ Z = 0.19, OR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.27–2.97), P = 0.85], ileus [ Z = 1.47, OR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.38–1.15), P = 0.14], urinary complications [ Z = 0.66, OR = 1.22, 95% CI (0.67–2.22), P = 0.51], respiratory complications [ Z = 0.84, OR = 0.64, 95% CI (0.22–1.82), P = 0.40], conversion to open surgery [ Z = 1.73, OR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.35–1.07), P = 0.08], unscheduled reoperation [ Z = 0.14, OR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.26–3.20), P = 0.89], perioperative mortality [ Z = 0.28, OR = 0.79, 95% CI (0.15–4.12), P = 0.78], and pathological outcomes were similar between robotic and laparoscopic rectal surgery. Conclusion Robotic surgery for rectal cancer was comparable to laparoscopic surgery with respect to postoperative complications within 30 days." @default.
• W3127902494 created "2021-02-15" @default.
• W3127902494 creator A5022102185 @default.
• W3127902494 creator A5044264346 @default.
• W3127902494 creator A5049963236 @default.
• W3127902494 creator A5062598347 @default.
• W3127902494 creator A5081254090 @default.
• W3127902494 creator A5085619108 @default.
• W3127902494 date "2021-02-03" @default.
• W3127902494 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W3127902494 title "Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" @default.
• W3127902494 cites W1537972189 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W1926888387 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W1986215651 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2007872832 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2015969986 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2017065223 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2067827673 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2100433691 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2104029004 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2112563529 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2139094974 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2165579757 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2166050902 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2228782335 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2254710653 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2291726346 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2403317826 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2619637999 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2761662440 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2766869780 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2768521646 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2886754512 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2895425619 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2904366379 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2944419752 @default.
• W3127902494 cites W2986644798 @default.
• W3127902494 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02128-2" @default.
• W3127902494 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7860622" @default.
• W3127902494 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33536032" @default.
• W3127902494 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3127902494 type Work @default.
• W3127902494 sameAs 3127902494 @default.
• W3127902494 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W3127902494 countsByYear W31279024942021 @default.
• W3127902494 countsByYear W31279024942022 @default.
• W3127902494 countsByYear W31279024942023 @default.
• W3127902494 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3127902494 hasAuthorship W3127902494A5022102185 @default.
• W3127902494 hasAuthorship W3127902494A5044264346 @default.
• W3127902494 hasAuthorship W3127902494A5049963236 @default.
• W3127902494 hasAuthorship W3127902494A5062598347 @default.
• W3127902494 hasAuthorship W3127902494A5081254090 @default.
• W3127902494 hasAuthorship W3127902494A5085619108 @default.
• W3127902494 hasBestOaLocation W31279024941 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C2777125728 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C2780140570 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C103203806 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C121608353 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C126322002 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C141071460 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C168563851 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C2776111594 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C2776478404 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C2777125728 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C2780047204 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C2780120127 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C2780140570 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C31174226 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C523026621 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C526805850 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C71924100 @default.
• W3127902494 hasConceptScore W3127902494C95190672 @default.
• W3127902494 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3127902494 hasLocation W31279024941 @default.
• W3127902494 hasLocation W31279024942 @default.
• W3127902494 hasLocation W31279024943 @default.
• W3127902494 hasLocation W31279024944 @default.
• W3127902494 hasOpenAccess W3127902494 @default.
• W3127902494 hasPrimaryLocation W31279024941 @default.
• W3127902494 hasRelatedWork W1912209081 @default.
• W3127902494 hasRelatedWork W1985552249 @default.
• W3127902494 hasRelatedWork W1991690269 @default.
• W3127902494 hasRelatedWork W201071328 @default.
• W3127902494 hasRelatedWork W2183006741 @default.

• next