FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3129754811> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3129754811 abstract "In a sextet of recent decisions, the Roberts Court upended the longstanding framework for general and specific contacts-based personal jurisdiction. The Court's new approach has engendered uncertainty and erected insurmountable obstacles for some plaintiffs in locating an effective forum to vindicate their rights. We propose a novel solution to the injustices and unpredictability unleashed by these decisions: a new model corporate registration act that would require, as a condition of in a state, the corporation's consent to personal jurisdiction in defined circumstances that implicate state sovereign regulatory, protective, and prescriptive interests.Registration-based consent to jurisdiction has a long pedigree, dating back to the years before the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification. For much of its history, however, registration-based jurisdictional consent languished in obscurity, as general doing business jurisdiction overshadowed the doctrine. With the Supreme Court's recent at-home trilogy sounding the death knell of general continuous and systematic contacts jurisdiction, the constitutional propriety of interpreting a state corporate registration scheme to require the corporation's all-purpose jurisdictional consent for claims arising anywhere in the world is in doubt. Instead of litigating the meaning and ongoing validity of these longstanding registration statutes, we recommend that the states adopt a modernized jurisdictional-consent statute that ensures an appropriate state jurisdictional reach and operates within the Supreme Court's pronounced adjudicative framework.We draft and evaluate a proposal for such a statute, which we believe the Uniform Law Commission is especially well situated to consider, refine, and promulgate for the states' benefit. Such a statute would avoid the wasteful expense of litigating the interpretation of registration statutes initially adopted during the heyday of the horse and buggy. More importantly, the proposed act would allow the states to assert their sovereign authority to ensure access to justice for their residents after the dismantling of general jurisdiction. By precisely tailoring the statute to states' sovereign interests, the proposed act avoids constitutional pitfalls while still providing an effective jurisdictional reach for the states after the Roberts Court's jurisdictional revolution." @default.
• W3129754811 created "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3129754811 creator A5086803785 @default.
• W3129754811 creator A5087705483 @default.
• W3129754811 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W3129754811 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3129754811 title "A New State Registration Act: Legislating a Longer Arm for Personal Jurisdiction" @default.
• W3129754811 cites W1505300243 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W2492977724 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W2755937488 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W2788050821 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W2797678477 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W3117249098 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W3125601397 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4213228664 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4231660596 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4232672792 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4232745395 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4238785917 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4238896200 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4239337661 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4241030522 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4245866683 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4245947638 @default.
• W3129754811 cites W4247176123 @default.
• W3129754811 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3571811" @default.
• W3129754811 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3129754811 type Work @default.
• W3129754811 sameAs 3129754811 @default.
• W3129754811 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3129754811 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3129754811 hasAuthorship W3129754811A5086803785 @default.
• W3129754811 hasAuthorship W3129754811A5087705483 @default.
• W3129754811 hasBestOaLocation W31297548112 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C2778495862 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C11413529 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C144133560 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C17744445 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C199539241 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C2776949292 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C2778495862 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C41008148 @default.
• W3129754811 hasConceptScore W3129754811C48103436 @default.
• W3129754811 hasLocation W31297548111 @default.
• W3129754811 hasLocation W31297548112 @default.
• W3129754811 hasOpenAccess W3129754811 @default.
• W3129754811 hasPrimaryLocation W31297548111 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W1449635564 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W18826492 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W2231335907 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W2335972844 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W2528850953 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W2760959751 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W3156885202 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W3194043879 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W4313026852 @default.
• W3129754811 hasRelatedWork W191522502 @default.
• W3129754811 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3129754811 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3129754811 magId "3129754811" @default.
• W3129754811 workType "article" @default.