FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3130781312> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3130781312 endingPage "872" @default.
• W3130781312 startingPage "866" @default.
• W3130781312 abstract "Background: There is a lack of evidence in the literature comparing outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Purpose: To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and complications between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between June 2010 and February 2018, 130 competitive rugby players with anterior shoulder instability were operated on in our institution. The first 80 patients were operated on with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure and the other 50 with the open Latarjet procedure. Return to sport, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. Results: In the total population, the mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-90 months) and the mean age was 24.2 years (range, 16-33 years). Ninety-two percent of patients were able to return to rugby, 88% at their preinjury level of play. Eighty-nine percent of patients in the Bankart group and 87% in the Latarjet group returned to compete at the same level ( P = .788). No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement after operation ( P < .01). No significant difference in functional scores was found between the groups The Rowe score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean (± SD) of 41 ± 13 points to 89.7 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 42.5 ± 14 points to 88.4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). The ASOSS score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean of 53.3 ± 3 points to 93.3 ± 6 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 53.1 ± 3 points to 93.7 ± 4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). There were 18 recurrences (14%). The rate of recurrence was 20% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .01). There were 15 reoperations (12%). The rate of reoperation was 16% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .03). There were 6 complications (5%). The rate of complications was 4% in the Bankart group and 6% in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). The proportion of postoperative osteoarthritis was 10% in the Bankart group (8/80 patients) and 12% (6/50 patients) in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). Conclusion: In competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%, both the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure produced excellent functional outcomes, with most athletes returning to sport at the same level they had before the injury. However, the Bankart procedure was associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrence (20% vs 4%) and reoperation (16% vs 4%) than the Latarjet procedure." @default.
• W3130781312 created "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3130781312 creator A5024829363 @default.
• W3130781312 creator A5040358480 @default.
• W3130781312 creator A5051641033 @default.
• W3130781312 creator A5069770704 @default.
• W3130781312 creator A5081882704 @default.
• W3130781312 date "2021-02-19" @default.
• W3130781312 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W3130781312 title "Recurrence and Revision Rates With Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared With the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby Players With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20%" @default.
• W3130781312 cites W1431027972 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W1978783662 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2041527291 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2055090547 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2073846686 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2080596064 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2109742017 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2123851715 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2169753130 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2268785906 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2283111625 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2517588531 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2739786203 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2755710077 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2755908773 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2757927800 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2765434687 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2782953532 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2810929652 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2891429075 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2899878025 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2904559012 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2905096187 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2961978365 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2966664540 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2981082907 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2985760383 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W2995130187 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W4238209295 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W4255501300 @default.
• W3130781312 cites W4293079514 @default.
• W3130781312 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520988154" @default.
• W3130781312 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33606555" @default.
• W3130781312 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3130781312 type Work @default.
• W3130781312 sameAs 3130781312 @default.
• W3130781312 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W3130781312 countsByYear W31307813122021 @default.
• W3130781312 countsByYear W31307813122022 @default.
• W3130781312 countsByYear W31307813122023 @default.
• W3130781312 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3130781312 hasAuthorship W3130781312A5024829363 @default.
• W3130781312 hasAuthorship W3130781312A5040358480 @default.
• W3130781312 hasAuthorship W3130781312A5051641033 @default.
• W3130781312 hasAuthorship W3130781312A5069770704 @default.
• W3130781312 hasAuthorship W3130781312A5081882704 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C126249036 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C2777307732 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C2778436160 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C2780879209 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C126249036 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C141071460 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C2777307732 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C2778436160 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C2779162959 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C2780879209 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C60465272 @default.
• W3130781312 hasConceptScore W3130781312C71924100 @default.
• W3130781312 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3130781312 hasLocation W31307813121 @default.
• W3130781312 hasOpenAccess W3130781312 @default.
• W3130781312 hasPrimaryLocation W31307813121 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W1991012345 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W2051259459 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W2087377818 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W2162506557 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W2532429610 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W2803292105 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W2912815000 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W3117308703 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W4200233838 @default.
• W3130781312 hasRelatedWork W4243945563 @default.
• W3130781312 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W3130781312 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3130781312 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3130781312 magId "3130781312" @default.
• W3130781312 workType "article" @default.