FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3132445281> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3132445281 endingPage "562" @default.
• W3132445281 startingPage "552" @default.
• W3132445281 abstract "Context Health economic evaluations (e.g., cost-effectiveness analysis) can guide the efficient use of resources to improve health outcomes. This study aims to summarize the content and quality of interpersonal violence prevention economic evaluations. Evidence acquisition In 2020, peer-reviewed journal articles published during 2000–2019 focusing on high-income countries were identified using index terms in multiple databases. Study content, including violence type prevented (e.g., child abuse and neglect), outcome measure (e.g., abusive head trauma clinical diagnosis), intervention type (e.g., education program), study methods, and results were summarized. Studies reporting on selected key methods elements essential for study comparison and public health decision making (e.g., economic perspective, time horizon, discounting, currency year) were assessed. Evidence synthesis A total of 26 economic evaluation studies were assessed, most of which reported that assessed interventions yielded good value for money. Physical assault in the community and child abuse and neglect were the most common violence types examined. Studies applied a wide variety of cost estimates to value avoided violence. Less than two thirds of the studies reported all the key methods elements. Conclusions Comprehensive data collection on violence averted and intervention costs in experimental settings can increase opportunities to identify interventions that generate long-term value. More comprehensive estimates of the cost of violence can improve opportunities to demonstrate how prevention investment can be offset through avoided future costs. Better adherence to health economic evaluation reporting standards can enhance comparability across studies and may increase the likelihood that economic evidence is included in violence prevention decision making. Health economic evaluations (e.g., cost-effectiveness analysis) can guide the efficient use of resources to improve health outcomes. This study aims to summarize the content and quality of interpersonal violence prevention economic evaluations. In 2020, peer-reviewed journal articles published during 2000–2019 focusing on high-income countries were identified using index terms in multiple databases. Study content, including violence type prevented (e.g., child abuse and neglect), outcome measure (e.g., abusive head trauma clinical diagnosis), intervention type (e.g., education program), study methods, and results were summarized. Studies reporting on selected key methods elements essential for study comparison and public health decision making (e.g., economic perspective, time horizon, discounting, currency year) were assessed. A total of 26 economic evaluation studies were assessed, most of which reported that assessed interventions yielded good value for money. Physical assault in the community and child abuse and neglect were the most common violence types examined. Studies applied a wide variety of cost estimates to value avoided violence. Less than two thirds of the studies reported all the key methods elements. Comprehensive data collection on violence averted and intervention costs in experimental settings can increase opportunities to identify interventions that generate long-term value. More comprehensive estimates of the cost of violence can improve opportunities to demonstrate how prevention investment can be offset through avoided future costs. Better adherence to health economic evaluation reporting standards can enhance comparability across studies and may increase the likelihood that economic evidence is included in violence prevention decision making." @default.
• W3132445281 created "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3132445281 creator A5041179045 @default.
• W3132445281 creator A5041914542 @default.
• W3132445281 date "2021-04-01" @default.
• W3132445281 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3132445281 title "Systematic Review of Violence Prevention Economic Evaluations, 2000–2019" @default.
• W3132445281 cites W1782738858 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W1860519098 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W1970684445 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W1984967398 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2002927218 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2003719173 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2016382342 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2054449412 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2068739404 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2081168239 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2089952269 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2096401466 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2104289475 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2109146649 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2114337132 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2119149111 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2128911553 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2136687084 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2140781112 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2144570229 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2145121994 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2147629585 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2155286468 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2163089811 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2165211436 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2271770834 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2519603001 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2531072466 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2552874961 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2582143364 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2618639379 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2728797496 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2737705415 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2762668669 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2795810135 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2800854827 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2823396748 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2888270547 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2888291160 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2888902719 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2914185992 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2944647080 @default.
• W3132445281 cites W2970227924 @default.
• W3132445281 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.11.002" @default.
• W3132445281 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7987799" @default.
• W3132445281 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33608188" @default.
• W3132445281 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3132445281 type Work @default.
• W3132445281 sameAs 3132445281 @default.
• W3132445281 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W3132445281 countsByYear W31324452812022 @default.
• W3132445281 countsByYear W31324452812023 @default.
• W3132445281 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3132445281 hasAuthorship W3132445281A5041179045 @default.
• W3132445281 hasAuthorship W3132445281A5041914542 @default.
• W3132445281 hasBestOaLocation W31324452812 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C197947376 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C2776289891 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C6177178 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C10138342 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C112930515 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C114614502 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C118552586 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C138816342 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C142724271 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C144133560 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C15744967 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C159110408 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C162118730 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C197947376 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C27415008 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C2776125615 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C2776289891 @default.
• W3132445281 hasConceptScore W3132445281C3017944768 @default.

• next