Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3132469970> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W3132469970 abstract "News consumers are frequently exposed to seemingly conflicting claims about the risks or benefits of activities such as eating meat and drinking coffee, which can lead to confusion and backlash against expert advice. One factor that may artificially inflate perceived conflict is the tendency for news headlines to generically attribute such claims to ‘Scientists’, ‘Experts’ or ‘Researchers’. This can create the perception that scientific consensus frequently changes, with ‘experts’ saying one thing one day (e.g., “Fasting diet could regenerate pancreas and reverse diabetes, researchers say”) and another the next (“Fasting diets may raise risk of diabetes, researchers warn”). We predicted that hedging news headlines with the qualifier ‘some’ (e.g., …some researchers say) would reduce perceived contradiction and backlash by triggering the scalar inference “some but not all…”. We presented participants with a series of conflicting headlines or non-conflicting headlines about health and nutrition. These were presented in either their original generic format (e.g., Researchers say…) or in a qualified format (e.g., Some researchers say…). Those that saw conflicting headlines felt they were more contradictory, more confusing and resulted in us knowing less about how to be healthy than those who saw the non-conflicting headlines (Experiment 1, N=294). In Experiment 2 (N=400), the same conflict manipulation had no effect on more general beliefs about nutrition or the development of science. When our conflict manipulation did affect beliefs (Experiment 1) the effect of conflict was not moderated by headline format. Our results suggest that replacing generic consensus claims (e.g., Researchers say…) with qualified consensus claims (e.g., Some researchers say…) does not reduce the perceived contradiction and confusion that are typically associated with conflicting news reports." @default.
- W3132469970 created "2021-03-01" @default.
- W3132469970 creator A5013386261 @default.
- W3132469970 creator A5051072922 @default.
- W3132469970 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3132469970 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3132469970 title "When ‘Scientists Say’ Coffee Is Good for You One Day and Bad for You the Next: Do Generic Attributions to ‘Scientists’ and ‘Experts’ Amplify Perceived Conflict?" @default.
- W3132469970 cites W2201168500 @default.
- W3132469970 cites W2970446905 @default.
- W3132469970 cites W3113266290 @default.
- W3132469970 doi "https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.23447" @default.
- W3132469970 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3132469970 type Work @default.
- W3132469970 sameAs 3132469970 @default.
- W3132469970 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3132469970 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3132469970 hasAuthorship W3132469970A5013386261 @default.
- W3132469970 hasAuthorship W3132469970A5051072922 @default.
- W3132469970 hasBestOaLocation W31324699701 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C143299363 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C163355716 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C2776728590 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C2778689934 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C2781140086 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C111472728 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C11171543 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C112698675 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C138885662 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C143299363 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C144133560 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C15744967 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C163355716 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C169760540 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C26760741 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C2776035688 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C2776728590 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C2778689934 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C2781140086 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C46312422 @default.
- W3132469970 hasConceptScore W3132469970C77805123 @default.
- W3132469970 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3132469970 hasLocation W31324699701 @default.
- W3132469970 hasLocation W31324699702 @default.
- W3132469970 hasLocation W31324699703 @default.
- W3132469970 hasOpenAccess W3132469970 @default.
- W3132469970 hasPrimaryLocation W31324699701 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W1532782783 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W1977077044 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W1978277934 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W1988116171 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W2005553507 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W2005688106 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W2115487821 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W2809777561 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W4233507123 @default.
- W3132469970 hasRelatedWork W4241244268 @default.
- W3132469970 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W3132469970 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3132469970 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3132469970 magId "3132469970" @default.
- W3132469970 workType "article" @default.