FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3133485692> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3133485692 abstract "ABSTRACT Background Concern about long waiting times for elective surgeries is not a recent phenomenon, but it has been heightened by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated measures. One way to alleviate the problem might be to use prioritisation methods for patients on the waiting list and a wide range of research is available on such methods. However, significant variations and inconsistencies have been reported in prioritisation protocols from various specialties, institutions, and health systems. To bridge the evidence gap in existing literature, this comprehensive systematic review will synthesise global evidence on policy strategies with a unique insight to patient prioritisation methods to reduce waiting times for elective surgeries. This will provide evidence that might help with the tremendous burden of surgical disease that is now apparent in many countries because of operations that were delayed or cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic and inform policy for sustainable healthcare management systems. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with our most recent searches in January 2020. Articles published after 2013 on major elective surgery lists of adult patients were eligible, but cancer and cancer-related surgeries were excluded. Both randomised and non-randomised studies were eligible and the quality of studies was assessed with ROBINS-I and CASP tools. We registered the review in PROSPERO (CRD42019158455) and reported it in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Results The electronic search in five bibliographic databases yielded 7543 records (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane) and 17 eligible articles were identified in the screening. There were four quasi-experimental studies, 11 observational studies and two systematic reviews. These demonstrated moderate to low risk of bias in their research methods. Three studies tested generic approaches using common prioritisation systems for all elective surgeries in common. The other studies assessed specific prioritisation approaches for re-ordering the waiting list for a particular surgical specialty. Conclusions Explicit prioritisation tools with a standardised scoring system based on clear evidence-based criteria are likely to reduce waiting times and improve equitable access to health care. Multiple attributes need to be considered in defining a fair prioritisation system to overcome limitations with local variations and discriminations. Collating evidence from a diverse body of research provides a single framework to improve the quality and efficiency of elective surgical care provision in a variety of health settings. Universal prioritisation tools with vertical and horizontal equity would help with re-ordering patients on waiting lists for elective surgery and reduce waiting times." @default.
• W3133485692 created "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3133485692 creator A5060019219 @default.
• W3133485692 creator A5068789733 @default.
• W3133485692 creator A5080521696 @default.
• W3133485692 date "2021-02-21" @default.
• W3133485692 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3133485692 title "Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: a systematic review of how to improve access to surgery" @default.
• W3133485692 cites W100362468 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W140001830 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1674327064 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1782514570 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1850890739 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1944572849 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1978118322 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1986204623 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1986471031 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W1992895016 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2005642971 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2009076330 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2011770693 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2012160149 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2021466367 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2056063792 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2112647866 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2123321380 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2128231369 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2158703895 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2165439176 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2168475719 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2187789008 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2289457705 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2346164141 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2346297786 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2412692381 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2461061005 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2471874471 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2531269403 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2744689482 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2776819904 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2789965863 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2794172424 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2806668462 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2886556096 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2897912648 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2945815262 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W2998210910 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W3022634224 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W3025891125 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W3032806058 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W3094831537 @default.
• W3133485692 cites W3185927375 @default.
• W3133485692 doi "https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.18.21252033" @default.
• W3133485692 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3133485692 type Work @default.
• W3133485692 sameAs 3133485692 @default.
• W3133485692 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3133485692 countsByYear W31334856922023 @default.
• W3133485692 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3133485692 hasAuthorship W3133485692A5060019219 @default.
• W3133485692 hasAuthorship W3133485692A5068789733 @default.
• W3133485692 hasAuthorship W3133485692A5080521696 @default.
• W3133485692 hasBestOaLocation W31334856921 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C2781312054 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C61904560 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C141071460 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C142724271 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C15744967 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C160735492 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C168563851 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C17744445 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C180747234 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C189708586 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C19648533 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C199539241 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C204787440 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C2776478404 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C2779356329 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C2779473830 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C2781312054 @default.
• W3133485692 hasConceptScore W3133485692C512399662 @default.

• next