Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3133520998> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3133520998 endingPage "e25381" @default.
- W3133520998 startingPage "e25381" @default.
- W3133520998 abstract "Background As the world’s population rapidly ages, the number of older adults with cognitive impairment will also increase. Several studies have identified numerous complex needs of people with dementia, which assistive technologies still fail to support. Recent trends have led to an increasing focus on the use of embodied conversational agents (ECAs) as virtual entities able to interact with a person through natural and familiar verbal and nonverbal communication. The use of ECAs could improve the accessibility and acceptance of assistive technologies matching those high-level needs that are not well covered to date. Objective The aim of this thematic literature analysis was to map current studies in the field of designing ECAs for patients with dementia in order to identify the existing research trend and possible gaps that need to be covered in the near future. The review questions in this study were as follows: (1) what research frameworks are used to study the interaction between patients with dementia and ECAs? (2) what are the findings? and (3) what are the barriers reported in these studies? Methods Separate literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases by using specific umbrella phrases to target the population (patients with dementia) and the technology-based intervention (embodied conversational agent). Studies that met the inclusion criteria were appraised through the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and then discussed in a thematic analysis. Results The search process identified 115 records from the databases and study references. After duplicates (n=45) were removed, 70 papers remained for the initial screening. A total of 7 studies were finally included in the qualitative synthesis. A thematic analysis of the reviewed studies identified major themes and subthemes: the research frameworks used to gather users’ perspectives on ECAs (theme 1), the insights shared by the 7 studies as well as the value of user involvement in the development phases and the challenge of matching the system functionalities with the users’ needs (theme 2), and the main methodological and technical problems faced by each study team (theme 3). Conclusions Our thematic literature analysis shows that the field of ECAs is novel and poorly discussed in the scientific community and that more sophisticated study designs and proofs of efficacy of the approach are required. Therefore, by analyzing the main topic of the narrative review, this study underscores the challenge of synchronizing and harmonizing knowledge, efforts, and challenges in the dementia care field and its person-centered paradigm through the user-centered design approach. Enabling strict collaboration between interdisciplinary research networks, medical scientists, technology developers, patients, and their formal and informal caregivers is still a great challenge in the field of technologies for older adults." @default.
- W3133520998 created "2021-03-15" @default.
- W3133520998 creator A5009742246 @default.
- W3133520998 creator A5024132401 @default.
- W3133520998 creator A5024940664 @default.
- W3133520998 creator A5052896915 @default.
- W3133520998 creator A5078649495 @default.
- W3133520998 date "2021-07-16" @default.
- W3133520998 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W3133520998 title "Embodied Conversational Agents for Patients With Dementia: Thematic Literature Analysis" @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1480447586 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1644143258 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1804383962 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1837640116 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1847168837 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1977519940 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1979290264 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1982875284 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W1988568632 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2000141967 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2004941501 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2014423218 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2016678857 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2018704709 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2026487189 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2037593681 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2037867671 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2085456317 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2097858028 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2125410178 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2146505999 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2147927650 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2159739693 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2160932378 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2172411749 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2208053283 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2236675042 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2398432828 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2576439802 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2581788138 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2586471976 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2587504999 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2588797044 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2612630960 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2790358827 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2799387460 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2800959557 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2903466273 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2908750433 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2916029358 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2934309502 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2940497330 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2948928740 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2951846435 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2975524494 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W2981514221 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W3046275966 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W4210987525 @default.
- W3133520998 cites W4213244316 @default.
- W3133520998 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/25381" @default.
- W3133520998 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8325086" @default.
- W3133520998 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34269686" @default.
- W3133520998 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3133520998 type Work @default.
- W3133520998 sameAs 3133520998 @default.
- W3133520998 citedByCount "12" @default.
- W3133520998 countsByYear W31335209982021 @default.
- W3133520998 countsByYear W31335209982022 @default.
- W3133520998 countsByYear W31335209982023 @default.
- W3133520998 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3133520998 hasAuthorship W3133520998A5009742246 @default.
- W3133520998 hasAuthorship W3133520998A5024132401 @default.
- W3133520998 hasAuthorship W3133520998A5024940664 @default.
- W3133520998 hasAuthorship W3133520998A5052896915 @default.
- W3133520998 hasAuthorship W3133520998A5078649495 @default.
- W3133520998 hasBestOaLocation W31335209981 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConceptScore W3133520998C109359841 @default.
- W3133520998 hasConceptScore W3133520998C142724271 @default.