FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3133614419> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3133614419 endingPage "e25252" @default.
• W3133614419 startingPage "e25252" @default.
• W3133614419 abstract "Background Medical journals increasingly promote published content through social media platforms such as Twitter. However, gastroenterology journals still rank below average in social media engagement. Objective We aimed to determine the engagement patterns of publications in gastroenterology journals on Twitter and evaluate the impact of tweets on citations. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the 3-year citations of all full-length articles published in five major gastroenterology journals from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012, tweeted by official journal accounts with those that were not. Multivariate analysis using linear regression was performed to control for journal impact factor, time since publication, article type, frequency of reposting by other users (“retweets”), and media addition to tweets. Secondary analyses were performed to assess the associations between article type or subtopic and the likelihood of social media promotion/engagement. Results A total of 1666 articles were reviewed, with 477 tweeted by the official journal account. Tweeting an article independently predicted increased citations after controlling for potential confounders (β coefficient=13.09; P=.007). There was significant association between article type and number of retweets on analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P<.001), with guidelines/technical reviews (mean difference 1.04, 95% CI 0.22-1.87; P<.001) and meta-analyses/systemic reviews (mean difference 1.03, 95% CI 0.35-1.70; P<.001) being retweeted more than basic science articles. The manuscript subtopics most frequently promoted included motility/functional bowel disease (odds ratio [OR] 3.84, 95% CI 1.93-7.64; P<.001) and education (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.62-13.58; P=.004), while basic science papers were less likely tweeted (OR 0.154, 95% CI 0.07-0.34; P<.001). Conclusions Tweeting of gastroenterology journal articles independently predicted higher 3-year citations. Wider adoption of social media to increase reach and measure uptake of published research should be considered." @default.
• W3133614419 created "2021-03-15" @default.
• W3133614419 creator A5043462014 @default.
• W3133614419 creator A5048446324 @default.
• W3133614419 creator A5053717482 @default.
• W3133614419 creator A5085335815 @default.
• W3133614419 date "2021-05-14" @default.
• W3133614419 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3133614419 title "The Patterns and Impact of Social Media Exposure of Journal Publications in Gastroenterology: Retrospective Cohort Study" @default.
• W3133614419 cites W1491754772 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W1941190922 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W1965964177 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W1977358491 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2003816148 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2062942357 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2067517664 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2081305716 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2132631086 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2202899536 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2269527703 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2290669051 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W233227767 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2517248622 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2556015443 @default.
• W3133614419 cites W2606777021 @default.
• W3133614419 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/25252" @default.
• W3133614419 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8164116" @default.
• W3133614419 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33707166" @default.
• W3133614419 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3133614419 type Work @default.
• W3133614419 sameAs 3133614419 @default.
• W3133614419 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3133614419 countsByYear W31336144192022 @default.
• W3133614419 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3133614419 hasAuthorship W3133614419A5043462014 @default.
• W3133614419 hasAuthorship W3133614419A5048446324 @default.
• W3133614419 hasAuthorship W3133614419A5053717482 @default.
• W3133614419 hasAuthorship W3133614419A5085335815 @default.
• W3133614419 hasBestOaLocation W31336144191 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C126322002 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C156957248 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C167135981 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C17744445 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C199539241 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C512399662 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C518677369 @default.
• W3133614419 hasConceptScore W3133614419C71924100 @default.
• W3133614419 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3133614419 hasLocation W31336144191 @default.
• W3133614419 hasLocation W31336144192 @default.
• W3133614419 hasLocation W31336144193 @default.
• W3133614419 hasOpenAccess W3133614419 @default.
• W3133614419 hasPrimaryLocation W31336144191 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W2215792168 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W2324013405 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W2969155864 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W3013145321 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W3134028840 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W3208090289 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W3210359220 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W4284673498 @default.
• W3133614419 hasRelatedWork W4367672288 @default.
• W3133614419 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W3133614419 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3133614419 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3133614419 magId "3133614419" @default.
• W3133614419 workType "article" @default.