FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3134361335> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3134361335 endingPage "xxxvii" @default.
• W3134361335 startingPage "iii" @default.
• W3134361335 abstract "The focus of this special issue of the Osgoode Hall Law Journal is on identifying holders of rights which are recognized and affirmed by section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. While Canadian and provincial governments and industry proponents have assumed that Indian Act bands are section 35 rights-holders, Kent McNeil’s analysis of the relevant jurisprudence reveals that this issue is to be resolved with reference to Aboriginal peoples’ own laws. As such, the assumption that a section 35 rights-holder must possess an overarching governance structure is unwarranted if the relevant Aboriginal people’s own laws are not grounded in positivism. Naiomi Metallic’s incisive critique demonstrates that the reasoning in R v Bernard was captured by precisely this type of positivist assumption when the court held that smaller Mìgmaq collectives—as opposed to the larger Mìgmaq nation—must be the rights-holder because the larger Mìgmaq nation lacked a ‘Super Chief’. Gordon Christie identifies another form of capture within the section 35 jurisprudence: Aboriginal peoples are presumed to be socio-cultural bodies and not political bodies, and Aboriginal rights are presumed to be cultural activities and not governmental powers to exercise jurisdictional authority. Both presumptions are captured by liberalism and neither is supported by the text or by a purposive interpretation of section 35(1). Sara Mainville’s article uncovers a conflict between Canadian and Indigenous law in the context of a Kelly order, which courts characterize as a practical solution to the dilemma of how to identify the rights-holder on an interlocutory motion. Mainville demonstrates that the adversarial effects of a Kelly order contravene the Anishinaabe legal principle of consensus-building. Perhaps unsurprisingly given these various conflicts between Canadian jurisprudence and Indigenous laws, Paul Chartrand argues that the identity of rights-holders should be decided through political negotiations between political actors, and not by the courts. Similarly, Jason Madden argues that the Supreme Court of Canada’s jurisprudence entails a duty on Canadian and provincial governments to negotiate with an Aboriginal people to identify the proper rights-holder when a prima facie Aboriginal right exists. In these ways, the articles in this special issue make valuable contributions to ongoing discussions about identifying section 35 rights-holders." @default.
• W3134361335 created "2021-03-15" @default.
• W3134361335 creator A5012215110 @default.
• W3134361335 date "2021-01-14" @default.
• W3134361335 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W3134361335 title "A Right Without a Rights-Holder Is Hollow: Introduction to OHLJ’s Special Issue on Identifying Rights-Bearing Aboriginal Peoples" @default.
• W3134361335 doi "https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3615" @default.
• W3134361335 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3134361335 type Work @default.
• W3134361335 sameAs 3134361335 @default.
• W3134361335 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3134361335 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3134361335 hasAuthorship W3134361335A5012215110 @default.
• W3134361335 hasBestOaLocation W31343613351 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C128706718 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C55958113 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C112698675 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C128706718 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C144024400 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C144133560 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C166957645 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C169437150 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C17744445 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C18903297 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C199539241 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C205649164 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C2776154427 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C2779343474 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C2780129039 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C55958113 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C71043370 @default.
• W3134361335 hasConceptScore W3134361335C86803240 @default.
• W3134361335 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3134361335 hasLocation W31343613351 @default.
• W3134361335 hasLocation W31343613352 @default.
• W3134361335 hasOpenAccess W3134361335 @default.
• W3134361335 hasPrimaryLocation W31343613351 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W1979058829 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2096548167 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2103282597 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2333123888 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2382575333 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2582156893 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2736484656 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W3011728213 @default.
• W3134361335 hasRelatedWork W3157945915 @default.
• W3134361335 hasVolume "57" @default.
• W3134361335 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3134361335 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3134361335 magId "3134361335" @default.
• W3134361335 workType "article" @default.