FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3134764906> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3134764906 endingPage "277" @default.
• W3134764906 startingPage "272" @default.
• W3134764906 abstract "Aesthetic rhinoplasty remains a challenging procedure with high expectations and narrow tolerance for errors. Considerable training is required to achieve controlled and reliable results. Use of the Piezotome is gaining popularity for performing the nasal osteotomies, a key step in rhinoplasty, where it is reported to improve precision and predictability and to keep tissue damage to a minimum. We compare the outcomes of conventional osteotomy techniques to piezosurgery in human cadavers as undertaken by surgical trainees.Seven human cadavers were used and a total of 14 osteotomies were performed. Conventional osteotomies and piezosurgery were carried out each on one side of the cadaver. A number of fragments and a blinded assessment of the accuracy of the osteotomy compared with the preprocedure skin markings were carried out by two experienced rhinoplasty surgeons. The Mann-Whitney test for statistical analysis was used.The mean number of fragments was 1.57 in the piezosurgery osteotomy and 2.14 using conventional osteotomies. Four of seven piezosurgery osteotomies achieved an accuracy within 1mm. The conventional osteotomies as performed by the trainees showed a significant mismatch of more than 3mm in three of seven of cases. Accuracy within 1mm was achieved in one of seven cases.Piezosurgery offers a safe, reliable and precise method of performing lateral nasal osteotomies. This human cadaver study shows a high accuracy of osteotomy and fewer comminuted fractures using this technique compared with conventional osteotomy techniques." @default.
• W3134764906 created "2021-03-15" @default.
• W3134764906 creator A5003197071 @default.
• W3134764906 creator A5034424198 @default.
• W3134764906 creator A5080066417 @default.
• W3134764906 date "2021-04-01" @default.
• W3134764906 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3134764906 title "A comparison of piezo surgery osteotomies with conventional internal osteotomies as performed by trainee surgeons: a cadaveric study" @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1521741262 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1578570498 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1964806201 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1975936929 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1980411387 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1981401551 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W1995282632 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2004722534 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2017383529 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2053450100 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2068975212 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2070330672 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2070660777 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2071798144 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2079914014 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2086278400 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2092604051 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2094076778 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2101217318 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2103486484 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2156451547 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2168079161 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2237814005 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2400417361 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2605534227 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2608160271 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2753547325 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2891353035 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2969321214 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W2991207697 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W4250647016 @default.
• W3134764906 cites W4255208190 @default.
• W3134764906 doi "https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.7120" @default.
• W3134764906 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33682473" @default.
• W3134764906 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3134764906 type Work @default.
• W3134764906 sameAs 3134764906 @default.
• W3134764906 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3134764906 countsByYear W31347649062021 @default.
• W3134764906 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3134764906 hasAuthorship W3134764906A5003197071 @default.
• W3134764906 hasAuthorship W3134764906A5034424198 @default.
• W3134764906 hasAuthorship W3134764906A5080066417 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C2776050027 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C2778311950 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C141071460 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C175696284 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C199343813 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C2776050027 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C2776389721 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C2778311950 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C29694066 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C71924100 @default.
• W3134764906 hasConceptScore W3134764906C91762617 @default.
• W3134764906 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3134764906 hasLocation W31347649061 @default.
• W3134764906 hasLocation W31347649062 @default.
• W3134764906 hasOpenAccess W3134764906 @default.
• W3134764906 hasPrimaryLocation W31347649061 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W1964806201 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W1975437476 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W2051096614 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W2103411154 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W2129137836 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W2168079161 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W3026188586 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W3033976483 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W3134764906 @default.
• W3134764906 hasRelatedWork W3153085870 @default.
• W3134764906 hasVolume "103" @default.
• W3134764906 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3134764906 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3134764906 magId "3134764906" @default.
• W3134764906 workType "article" @default.