FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3135896306> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3135896306 abstract "Abstract Background Gene drive technologies (GDTs) promote the rapid spread of a particular genetic element within a population of non-human organisms. Potential applications of GDTs include the control of insect vectors, invasive species and agricultural pests. Whether, and if so, under what conditions, GDTs should be deployed is hotly debated. Although broad stances in this debate have been described, the convictions that inform the moral views of the experts shaping these technologies and related policies have not been examined in depth in the academic literature. Methods In this qualitative study, we interviewed GDT experts (n = 33) from different disciplines to identify and better understand their moral views regarding these technologies. The pseudonymized transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results The respondents’ moral views were principally influenced by their attitudes towards (1) the uncertainty related to GDTs; (2) the alternatives to which they should be compared; and (3) the role humans should have in nature. Respondents agreed there is epistemic uncertainty related to GDTs, identified similar knowledge gaps, and stressed the importance of realistic expectations in discussions on GDTs. They disagreed about whether uncertainty provides a rationale to refrain from field trials (‘risks of intervention’ stance) or to proceed with phased testing to obtain more knowledge given the harms of the status quo (‘risks of non-intervention’ stance). With regards to alternatives to tackle vector-borne diseases, invasive species and agricultural pests, respondents disagreed about which alternatives should be considered (un)feasible and (in)sufficiently explored: conventional strategies (‘downstream solutions’ stance) or systematic changes to health care, political and agricultural systems (‘upstream solutions’ stance). Finally, respondents held different views on nature and whether the use of GDTs is compatible with humans’ role in nature (‘interference’ stance) or not (‘non-interference stance’). Conclusions This interview study helps to disentangle the debate on GDTs by providing a better understanding of the moral views of GDT experts. The obtained insights provide valuable stepping-stones for a constructive debate about underlying value conflicts and call attention to topics that deserve further (normative) reflection. Further evaluation of these issues can facilitate the debate on and responsible development of GDTs." @default.
• W3135896306 created "2021-03-15" @default.
• W3135896306 creator A5044833174 @default.
• W3135896306 creator A5051588251 @default.
• W3135896306 creator A5084553148 @default.
• W3135896306 date "2021-03-08" @default.
• W3135896306 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W3135896306 title "Experts’ moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study" @default.
• W3135896306 cites W1549586971 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W1780904181 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W1979848611 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W1993013666 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W1998008700 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2021760548 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2040419125 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2042894372 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2068231334 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2085748064 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2107967932 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2131477252 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2169652144 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2257514061 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2263233808 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2343529224 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2495420732 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2504970790 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2524597629 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2557601429 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2611465316 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2741865117 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2773954796 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2774846165 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2776895874 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2777723564 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2780055825 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2782356787 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2791267580 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2806605174 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2830090505 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2906781593 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2924106058 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2949331393 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2965668731 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2980159690 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W2989815444 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W3112041801 @default.
• W3135896306 cites W4234077260 @default.
• W3135896306 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00588-5" @default.
• W3135896306 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7938529" @default.
• W3135896306 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33685438" @default.
• W3135896306 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3135896306 type Work @default.
• W3135896306 sameAs 3135896306 @default.
• W3135896306 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W3135896306 countsByYear W31358963062021 @default.
• W3135896306 countsByYear W31358963062022 @default.
• W3135896306 countsByYear W31358963062023 @default.
• W3135896306 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3135896306 hasAuthorship W3135896306A5044833174 @default.
• W3135896306 hasAuthorship W3135896306A5051588251 @default.
• W3135896306 hasAuthorship W3135896306A5084553148 @default.
• W3135896306 hasBestOaLocation W31358963061 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C121242521 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C2776748549 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C2778060650 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C95124753 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C98108389 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C104317684 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C118552586 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C121242521 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C127413603 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C138885662 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C142724271 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C144024400 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C15744967 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C17744445 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C190248442 @default.
• W3135896306 hasConceptScore W3135896306C199539241 @default.

• next